首页> 外文OA文献 >A dissemination divide? The factors that influence the journal selection decision of Library Information Studies (LIS) researchers and practitioners
【2h】

A dissemination divide? The factors that influence the journal selection decision of Library Information Studies (LIS) researchers and practitioners

机译:传播鸿沟?影响图书馆和信息研究学报(LIS)研究人员和从业者的选择决策的因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With increasing volumes of research output and the continued emergence of new publishing venues, scholarly publishing has become a crowded landscape. This study analyses the factors that influence LIS authors when selecting a journal for submission, and in particular the significance of open access (OA) options and bibliometric indicators in this decision-making process. An online questionnaire with Likert scales was used to collect and rank the preferences and attitudes of LIS professionals. As part of the analysis, two separate sub-groups were examined using inferential statistical tests to explore if the research-practice divide so often cited in the LIS literature is also replicated in journal selection. It is concluded that choosing a journal for LIS research is a complex decision for both faculty members and librarians. Whilst some commonality exists between both groups, many variables show evidence of a divide in practices and preferences in consonance with the existing research.
机译:随着越来越多的研究产出和新出版场所的持续出现,学术出版社已成为拥挤的景观。本研究分析了在选择提交期刊时影响LIS作者的因素,特别是在该决策过程中的开放访问(OA)选项和义尺度指标的重要性。使用Likert Scales的在线问卷被用来收集并排名LIS专业人士的偏好和态度。作为分析的一部分,使用推断统计测试检查了两个单独的子组,以探索如果在LIS文献中经常引用的研究实践划分也被复制在日记选择中。它的结论是选择LIS研究杂志是教师和图书馆员的复杂决定。虽然两个群体之间存在一些共性,但许多变量都显示出与现有研究的合格化和偏好的证据。

著录项

  • 作者

    Michelle Dalton;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号