首页> 外文OA文献 >A descriptive analysis of the role of a WhatsApp clinical discussion group as a forum for continuing medical education in the management of complicated HIV and TB clinical cases in a group of doctors in the Eastern Cape, South Africa
【2h】

A descriptive analysis of the role of a WhatsApp clinical discussion group as a forum for continuing medical education in the management of complicated HIV and TB clinical cases in a group of doctors in the Eastern Cape, South Africa

机译:关于WhatsApp临床讨论群体作为南非东开普省东部的一群医生在南非的医生管理中继续医学教育的持续医学教育论坛的描述性分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: As South Africa’s (SA) HIV programme increases in size, HIV/TB cases occur that are often beyond the clinical scope of primary healthcare clinicians. In SA’s Eastern Cape (EC) province, health facilities are geographically widespread, with a discrepancy in specialist availability outside of academic institutions. The aim of this study is to describe WhatsApp and its use as an alternative learning tool to improve clinicians’ access to specialised management of complicated HIV/TB cases.Objectives: To analyse clinicians’ use of the WhatsApp chat group as a learning tool; to assess clinicians’ confidence in managing complicated HIV and TB patients after participating in the WhatsApp case discussion group; to describe the perceived usefulness of the chat group as a learning tool; to understand clinicians’ knowledge and use of informed consent when sharing patient case details on a public platform such as WhatsApp.Method: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted among a group of clinicians from the EC that formed part of a WhatsApp HIV/TB clinical discussion group. Data were collected using a structured anonymous Internet questionnaire and analysed with Epi Info, using descriptive and analytic statistics.Results: The analysis found the majority of participants had gained new clinical confidence from group participation. This was associated with the increased group engagement in group follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 48.13 [95% confidence interval [CI] 4.99–464.49]); in posting questions (OR 3.81 [95% CI 1.02–18.48]); in reports of ‘new’ clinical insights (OR 23.75 [95% CI 3.95–142.88]); in referencing old case material (OR 21.42 [95% CI 4.39–104.84]) and in the use of peer guidance to manage cases (OR 48.13 [95% CI 4.99–464.49]). However, there was a discrepancy in participants’ knowledge and actual use of informed consent when posting patient details on social media.Conclusions: Our study findings support the use of WhatsApp in a medical setting as an effective means of communication, long distance learning and support between peers and specialists.
机译:背景:随着南非的(SA)艾滋病毒计划的规模增加,艾滋病毒/结核病案件往往超出了初级医疗临床医生的临床范围。在SA的东开普(EC)省,卫生设施在地理上广泛普及,在学术机构之外的专业可用性中具有差异。本研究的目的是描述WhatsApp及其用作替代学习工具,以改善临床医生对复杂的HIV / TB案件的专业化管理。目的:分析临床医生使用WhatsApp聊天组作为学习工具的使用;在参加WhatsApp案例讨论组后,评估临床医生对管理复杂的艾滋病毒和结核病患者的信心;描述聊天组作为学习工具的感知有用性;在分享临床医生的知识和使用知情同意时,在诸如Whatsapp..Method等公共平台上的患者案例细节时:观察到的,横断面研究是在来自EC的一组临床医生中,形成了WhatsApp艾滋病毒的一部分结核病临床讨论组。使用结构化匿名互联网调查问卷收集数据,并使用描述性和分析统计分析。结果:分析发现大多数参与者从集团参与获得了新的临床信心。这与组随访中增加的组参与(差距[或] 48.13 [95%置信区间[CI] 4.99-464.49])有关;发布问题(或3.81 [95%CI 1.02-18.48]);在“新”临床洞察力的报告中(或23.75 [95%CI 3.95-142.88]);在参考旧案例材料(或21.42 [95%CI 4.39-104.84])和使用同行指南时进行管理病例(或48.13 [95%CI 4.99-464.49])。然而,当在社交媒体上发布患者细节时,参与者的知识和实际使用的知识和实际使用情况存在差异。结论:我们的研究调查结果支持在医疗环境中使用WhatsApp作为沟通的有效手段,远程学习和支持在同行和专家之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号