首页> 外文OA文献 >Validation of Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy to Measure Total Body Water in Resistance-Trained Males
【2h】

Validation of Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy to Measure Total Body Water in Resistance-Trained Males

机译:生物电阻抗光谱验证以测量耐久性的男性中的总体水

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The three-compartment (3-C) model of physique assessment (fat mass, fat-free mass, water) incorporates total body water (TBW) whereas the two-compartment model (2-C) assumes a TBW of 73.72%. Deuterium dilution (D2O) is the reference method for measuring TBW but is expensive and time consuming. Multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS SFB7TM) estimates TBW instantaneously and claims high precision. Our aim was to compare SFB7 with D2O for estimating TBW in resistance trained males (BMI >25kg/m2). We included TBWBIS estimates in a 3-C model and contrasted this and the 2-C model against the reference 3-C model using TBWD2O. TBW of 29 males (32.4 ± 8.5 years; 183.4 ± 7.2 cm; 92.5 ± 9.9 kg; 27.5 ± 2.6 kg/m2) was measured using SFB7 and D2O. Body density was measured by BODPOD, with body composition calculated using the Siri equation. TBWBIS values were consistent with TBWD2O (SEE = 2.65L; TE = 2.6L) as were %BF values from the 3-C model (BODPOD + TBWBIS) with the 3-C reference model (SEE = 2.20%; TE = 2.20%). For subjects with TBW more than 1% from the assumed 73.72% (n=16), %BF from the 2-C model differed significantly from the reference 3-C model (Slope 0.6888; Intercept 5.093). The BIS SFB7TM measured TBW accurately compared to D2O. The 2C model with an assumed TBW of 73.72% introduces error in the estimation of body composition. We recommend TBW should be measured, either via the traditional D2O method or when resources are limited, with BIS, so that body composition estimates are enhanced. The BIS can be accurately used in 3C equations to better predict TBW and BF% in resistance trained males compared to a 2C model.
机译:三室(3-C)的体格评估模型(脂肪质量,无脂肪质量,水)包含总体水(TBW),而两室模型(2-C)假设TBW为73.72%。氘稀释(D2O)是用于测量TBW的参考方法,但昂贵且耗时。多频生物电阻抗光谱(BIS SFB7TM)瞬间估计TBW和权利要求高精度。我们的目标是将SFB7与D2O进行比较,用于估计耐药性培训的男性TBW(BMI> 25kg / m2)。我们将TBWBIS估计包括在3-C模型中,并使用TBWD2O对比参考3-C型号的TBWBIS和2-C模型。 29男性的TBW(32.4±8.5厘米; 183.4±7.2厘米; 92.5±9.9千克;使用SFB7和D2O测量27.5±2.6 kg / m 2)。通过BoDPOD测量体密度,使用Siri方程计算体组合物。 TBWBIS值与TBWD2O(见= 2.65L; TE = 2.6L)一致,与3-C型号(BODPOD + TBWBIS)的%BF值与3-C参考模型(见= 2.20%; TE = 2.20%) )。对于来自假定的73.72%(n = 16)的TBW超过1%的受试者,来自2-C型号的%BF从参考3-C型号(斜率0.6888;拦截5.093)有显着不同。 BIS SFB7TM与D2O相比,将TBW精确测量。具有假定TBW的2C模型为73.72%引入了身体组成的估计中的错误。我们建议使用TBW来测量,无论是通过传统的D2O方法还是有限的,用BIS有限,以便提高身体成分估计。与2C模型相比,可以在3C方程中准确地使用在3C方程中以更好地预测阻力训练的男性的TBW和BF%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号