首页> 外文OA文献 >A Quantitative Comparison of Sticky-Price and Sticky-Information Models of Price Setting
【2h】

A Quantitative Comparison of Sticky-Price and Sticky-Information Models of Price Setting

机译:价格设置粘滞价格和粘性信息模型的定量比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

I estimate sticky-price and sticky-information models of price setting for the United States via maximum-likelihood techniques, reaching several conclusions. First, the sticky-price model fits best, and captures inflation dynamics as well as reduced-form equations once hybrid-behavior is allowed. Second, the importance of hybrid behavior in sticky-price models is potentially consistent with a role for some information imperfections, such as sticky information, as a complement to nominal price rigidities. Finally, the favorable results herein for the hybrid sticky-price model when evaluated by statistics that summarize the relative fit of different models is consistent with the existing literature that is both supportive and dismissive of such models, as this literature has largely ignored fit in evaluating such models. Many previous studies have focused on ancillary issues, such as the standard errors associated with certain parameters or Granger-causality tests that may not provide much information about sticky-price models. Copyright 2007 The Ohio State University.
机译:我通过最大似然技术估算美国价格环境的粘滞价格和粘性信息模型,达到了几个结论。首先,粘性价格模型最佳,并且一旦允许混合行为,才能捕获通胀动态以及减少方程。其次,粘性价格模型中的混合行为的重要性可能与某些信息不完美的作用符合粘性信息,例如粘性信息,作为对称价格刚性的补充。最后,当通过统计不同模型的相对统计评估时,本文的有利结果是在统计不同模型的相对适应性的情况下与现有的文献一致,这些文献既与此类模型的支持性和消除,那么这种文献在很大程度上忽略了评估这些模型。以前的许多研究都专注于辅助问题,例如与某些参数或格兰杰 - 因果试验相关的标准错误,可能无法提供有关粘性价格模型的许多信息。版权所有2007俄亥俄州州立大学。

著录项

  • 作者

    MICHAEL T. KILEY;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号