首页> 外文OA文献 >A single-arm trial indirect comparison investigation: a proof-of-concept method to predict venous leg ulcer healing time for a new acellular synthetic matrix matched to standard care control
【2h】

A single-arm trial indirect comparison investigation: a proof-of-concept method to predict venous leg ulcer healing time for a new acellular synthetic matrix matched to standard care control

机译:单臂试验间接比较调查:一种预测静脉腿部溃疡愈合时间的概念证明方法,用于标准护理控制匹配的新型无细胞合成基质

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To compare data on time to healing from two separate cohorts: one treated with a new acellular synthetic matrix plus standard care (SC) and one matched from four large UK pragmatic, randomised controlled trials [venous leg ulcer (VLU) evidence network]. We introduce a new proof-of-concept strategy to a VLU clinical evidence network, propensity score matching and sensitivity analysis to predict the feasibility of the new acellular synthetic matrix plus SC for success in future randomised, controlled clinical trials. Prospective data on chronic VLUs from a safety and effectiveness study on an acellular synthetic matrix conducted in one wound centre in the UK (17 patients) and three wound centres in Australia (36 patients) were compared retrospectively to propensity score-matched data from patients with comparable leg ulcer disease aetiology, age, baseline ulcer area, ulcer duration, multi-layer compression bandaging and majority of care completed in specialist wound centres (average of 1 visit per week), with the outcome measures at comparable follow-up periods from patients enrolled in four prospective, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised studies of venous ulcers in the UK (the comparison group; VLU evidence network). Analysis using Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a mean healing time of 73·1 days for ASM plus SC (ASM) treated ulcers in comparison with 83·5 days for comparison group ulcers treated with SC alone (Log rank test, χ(2) 5·779, P = 0·016) within 12 weeks. Sensitivity analysis indicates that an unobserved covariate would have to change the odds of healing for SC by a factor of 1·1 to impact the baseline results. Results from this study predict a significant effect on healing time when using a new ASM as an adjunct to SC in the treatment of non-healing venous ulcers in the UK, but results are sensitive to unobserved covariates that may be important in healing time comparison.
机译:为了比较两个独立队列的及时恢复数据:一个队列使用新的无细胞合成基质加标准护理(SC)治疗,另一个队列通过四项英国大型实用,随机对照试验[静脉腿溃疡(VLU)证据网络]进行匹配。我们向VLU临床证据网络,倾向得分匹配和敏感性分析引入了新的概念验证策略,以预测新型无细胞合成基质加SC在未来随机对照临床试验中取得成功的可行性。回顾性比较了在英国一个伤口中心(17例患者)和澳大利亚三个伤口中心(36例患者)进行的无细胞合成基质安全性和有效性研究的慢性VLU前瞻性数据与糖尿病患者倾向评分匹配数据的比较。可比的腿部溃疡病的病因,年龄,基线溃疡面积,溃疡持续时间,多层压迫绷带和在专业伤口中心完成的大部分护理(平均每周访问1次),并在可比较的随访期内对患者的结果进行测量在英国参加了四项关于静脉溃疡的前瞻性,多中心,务实,随机研究(比较组; VLU证据网络)。使用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线的分析显示,ASM加SC(ASM)治疗的溃疡的平均愈合时间为73·1天,相比之下,仅SC治疗的比较组溃疡的平均愈合时间为83·5天(对数秩检验,χ(2) 5·779,P = 0·016)在12周内。敏感性分析表明,未观察到的协变量必须将SC的治愈几率更改1·1,以影响基线结果。这项研究的结果预测,在英国使用新的ASM作为SC的辅助治疗非愈合性静脉溃疡时,对愈合时间会有显着影响,但结果对未观察到的协变量敏感,这在愈合时间比较中可能很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号