首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of two inlet boundary approaches in numerical simulation of car ventilation outlet flow
【2h】

Comparison of two inlet boundary approaches in numerical simulation of car ventilation outlet flow

机译:两种入口边界方法在汽车通风出口流动数值模拟中的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The paper is concerned with the comparison of two inlet boundary approaches of numerical simulations. The first approach is based on the simulation of a sufficiently long duct upstream the area of interest with known volumetric flow rate. The second approach rests on the experimental measurement of the section closer to the area of interest. The experimental measurement provides velocity profile and in addition turbulent intensity compared to the first approach where only a velocity profile can be computed according to known volumetric flow rate. A simplified model of car ventilation outlet was chosen as a test case. The model consists of circular and rectangular duct, area of interest (closing flap, vertical slats and horizontal slats) and outlet box. We have compared the two mentioned inlet boundary approaches for two distinct values of volumetric flow rate for which the experimental data of the section upstream of the area of interest are available. The velocity and the turbulent kinetic energy profiles downstream of the area of interest were chosen as comparative characteristics.
机译:本文涉及对数值模拟的两个入口边界方法的比较。第一方法基于以已知体积流量的感兴趣区域上游的足够长的管道的模拟。第二种方法依赖于近距离感兴趣区域的段的实验测量。实验测量提供速度曲线和另外的湍流强度,与第一方法相比,其中只能根据已知的体积流量计算速度分布。选择一种简化的汽车通风出口模型作为测试用例。该模型包括圆形和矩形管道,景点(关闭襟翼,垂直板条和水平板条)和出口箱。我们已经将两个提到的入口边界方法与其中有趣区域上游的部分的实验数据进行了两个不同的体积流量值。选择了下游感兴趣区域下游的速度和湍流动能曲线作为比较特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号