首页> 外文OA文献 >UK and Croatia: family practice, its medical records and computerisation in the context of an enlarged Europe
【2h】

UK and Croatia: family practice, its medical records and computerisation in the context of an enlarged Europe

机译:英国和克罗地亚:家庭实践,其在欧洲扩大的背景下的医疗记录和计算机化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Croatia and the UK have list-based general practice systems: patients register with a single practice. They are also progressively computerising family practice. We set out to identify and report where these countries might learn from each other's experience.Method Experiences, similarities and differences were derived from a literature review and visits to practices in Croatia and the UK.Results Both countries had developed unique but sophisticated paper-based primary care record systems. They have now moved to promote the computerisation of primary care; both countries see this as integral to patient safety, quality improvement and derivation of data for health service management. However, the development of primary care computing has been an organic process with small suppliers producing trial systems with natural selection of the more effective system.Conclusions IT has the potential to improve patient safety and the quality and efficiency of primary care. The lack of a theoretical framework for the comparison of systems hampers the development and selection of an optimum system.
机译:背景克罗地亚和英国有基于列表的一般实践系统:患者注册了单一的做法。他们也是逐步电脑化的家庭惯例。我们旨在识别和报告这些国家可能会从彼此的经验中吸取教训。方法的经验,相似之处和差异来自克罗地亚和英国的实践。这两国都制定了独特但精致的纸质初级保健记录系统。他们现在搬到了促进初级保健的计算机化;两国认为这一点是患者安全,质量改进和卫生服务数据数据的衍生资料。然而,初级保健计算的发展是一种有机过程,其中小供应商生产具有自然选择的试验系统,具有更有效的系统。结论,它有可能提高患者安全性和初级保健的质量和效率。缺乏用于比较系统的理论框架妨碍了最佳系统的开发和选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号