首页> 外文OA文献 >Usability Evaluation in Virtual Environments: Classification and Comparison of Methods
【2h】

Usability Evaluation in Virtual Environments: Classification and Comparison of Methods

机译:虚拟环境中的可用性评估:方法的分类和比较

摘要

Virtual environments (VEs) are a relatively new type of human-computer interface in which users perceive and act in a three-dimensional world. The designers of such systems cannot rely solely on design guidelines for traditional two-dimensional interfaces, so usability evaluation is crucial for VEs. We present an overview of VE usability evaluation. First, we discuss some of the issues that differentiate VE usability evaluation from evaluation of traditional user interfaces such as GUIs. We also present a review of VE evaluation methods currently in use, and discuss a simple classification space for VE usability evaluation methods. This classification space provides a structured means for comparing evaluation methods according to three key characteristics: involvement of representative users, context of evaluation, and types of results produced. To illustrate these concepts, we compare two existing evaluation approaches: testbed evaluation [Bowman, Johnson, & Hodges, 1999], and sequential evaluation [Gabbard, Hix, & Swan, 1999]. We conclude by presenting novel ways to effectively link these two approaches to VE usability evaluation.
机译:虚拟环境(VE)是一种相对新型的人机界面,用户可以在其中感知和执行三维世界。这种系统的设计者不能仅仅依靠传统二维界面的设计指南,因此可用性评估对于VE至关重要。我们对VE可用性评估进行了概述。首先,我们讨论将VE可用性评估与传统用户界面(如GUI)评估区分开的一些问题。我们还将介绍当前使用的VE评估方法,并讨论VE可用性评估方法的简单分类空间。该分类空间提供了一种结构化的方法,可以根据三个关键特征比较评估方法:代表性用户的参与,评估的背景以及产生的结果的类型。为了说明这些概念,我们比较了两种现有的评估方法:试验台评估[Bowman,Johnson,&Hodges,1999]和顺序评估[Gabbard,Hix,&Swan,1999]。最后,我们提出了新颖的方法来有效地将这两种方法链接到VE可用性评估。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号