首页> 外文OA文献 >Should I stay or should I go? The association between upward socio-economic neighbourhood change and moving propensities
【2h】

Should I stay or should I go? The association between upward socio-economic neighbourhood change and moving propensities

机译:我应该走还是留?向上社会经济邻里变革与迁移的关联

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous research on gentrification almost exclusively focussed on either the gentrifiers or those who are displaced. Those who manage to avoid displacement remain understudied. To shed new light on these original inhabitants, we link upward change in low-income neighbourhoods, measured by the changing socio-economic composition of the neighbourhood, to the propensity to move based on dissatisfaction with the neighbourhood or the home of both lower- or middle-educated people and higher-educated people living in these neighbourhoods. We perform binary logistic multi-level analyses on the Liveability Monitor of Ghent (N = 1037), a midsized city in Belgium. We find that upward neighbourhood change is associated with a higher propensity to move based on dissatisfaction with the home for both the lower- and higher-educated original inhabitants. Focusing on dissatisfaction with the neighbourhood, we find no association between moving propensities and the neighbourhood someone lives in. We therefore conclude that it is not the evaluation of the neighbourhood but the evaluation of one's own house in an improving neighbourhood that is associated with higher moving propensities, for both higher and lower educated respondents. Displacement pressures based on rising housing prices might lead to these moving propensities, but it seems likely that there are other factors at play too, like, e.g. life cycle mobility. We therefore also conclude that both lower- and higher-educated inhabitants of improving neighbourhoods deserve academic attention.
机译:以前关于Gentrification的研究几乎完全专注于林林代利人或那些流离失所者。那些设法避免流离失所的人仍然被解读。在这些原始居民的新光线上,我们通过不断变化社会经济成分的低收入社区的向上变化,以改变社会经济成分,以基于对邻域的不满或下部的不满或生活在这些社区的中等受教育的人和高等教育的人。我们在比利时中型城市的根特(n = 1037)的牲畜监控上执行二进制物流多级分析。我们发现向上的邻居变化与基于对低级和高等教育的原始居民的别人的不满来移动的更高的倾向。专注于与邻居的不满,我们发现移动的接触与邻居之间没有关联。因此,我们得出结论,它不是对社区的评估,而是在改善与更高的邻居中的改善社区中对自己的房子的评估不是评估适用于较高和较低受过教育的受访者。基于房价上涨的位移压力可能会导致这些移动的促使,但似乎也有其他因素也是如此,例如,例如,生命周期移动性。因此,我们也得出结论,改善社区的低级和高等教育居民值得学术关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号