首页> 外文OA文献 >Shenfu Injection for Intradialytic Hypotension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【2h】

Shenfu Injection for Intradialytic Hypotension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:沉府注射脑内低血压:系统审查和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Shenfu injection (SFI) for intradialytic hypotension (IDH). Methods. A systematic review of data sources published as of April 2014 was conducted. These included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2014 issue 4), Pubmed, Embase, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wangfang Data. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving SFI for treatment and prevention of IDH were identified. Two researchers independently selected articles, extracted data, assessed quality, and cross checked the results. Revman 5.2 was used to analyze the results. Results. Eight RCTs were included. The meta-analysis indicated that compared with conventional therapies alone, SFI could elevate systolic blood pressure (SBP), increase the clinical effective rate, decrease the incidence of hypotension, increase serum albumin (ALB) levels, and reduce C-reactive protein (CRP) levels without serious adverse effects. GRADE Quality of Evidence. the quality of SBP, the effective rate, ALB, and CRP were low, and hypotension incidence and DBP were very low. Conclusions. SFI is more effective than conventional therapies for prevention and treatment of IDH. However, a clinical recommendation is not warranted due to the small number of studies included and low methodology quality. Multi-center and high-quality RCTs with large sample sizes are needed to provide stronger evidence.
机译:客观的。评价脑府注射(SFI)对脑内低血压(IDH)的有效性和安全性。方法。对截至2014年4月发布的数据来源进行了系统审查。其中包括Cochrane Central寄存器的受控试验(2014款),PubMed,Embase,CBM,CNKI,VIP和Wangfang数据。鉴定了涉及SFI治疗和预防IDH的随机对照试验(RCT)。两位研究人员独立选择文章,提取数据,评估质量,并交叉检查结果。 Revman 5.2用于分析结果。结果。包括八个rcts。荟萃分析表明,与单独的常规疗法相比,SFI可以提高收缩压(SBP),增加临床有效率,降低低血压的发生率,增加血清白蛋白(ALB)水平,降低C反应蛋白(CRP )水平没有严重不利影响。等级证据质量。 SBP的质量,有效率,ALB和CRP是低的,低血压发病率和DBP非常低。结论。 SFI比常规疗法更有效,用于预防和治疗IDH。但是,由于包括少量的研究和低方法质量,临床推荐不需要保证。需要具有大型样品尺寸的多中心和高质量的RCT来提供更强大的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号