首页> 外文OA文献 >A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Vaginal vs Oral Prostaglandin E 1 Analogue (Misoprostol) in Management of First Trimester Missed Abortion
【2h】

A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Vaginal vs Oral Prostaglandin E 1 Analogue (Misoprostol) in Management of First Trimester Missed Abortion

机译:评估阴道与口服前列腺素E1类似物(Misoprostol)在孕产阶级堕胎管理中的疗效进行评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: Missed miscarriages, occurring in upto 15% of allclinically recognized pregnancies are a cause of concern for thepatients. Though many researchers in the past have comparedthe surgical and medical approaches in management of suchpatients, only a few have executed an appraisal of two routesof misoprostol at equal dosages in treatment of first trimestermissed miscarriages.Aim: To compare the efficacy of misoprostol by vaginal and oralroute, for the management of first trimester missed abortion;and to recognize the utility of misoprostol for cervical dilationprior to any surgical termination of pregnancy.Materials and Methods: A randomized prospective trial,comparing the efficacy of misoprostol, by vaginal and oralroutes, for termination of first trimester missed abortion wasconducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Government Multi-Specialty Hospital, Chandigarh over oneyear. Hundred subjects satisfying the inclusion criteria from 213consecutive women presenting to the institute with first trimestermissed abortion were hospitalized. The study participantswere randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups,using sequentially numbered envelopes, to receive 400mcgmisoprostol vaginally or orally to a maximum of three dosessix hours apart, and outcome documented. Patients werefollowed up on Day 14 and 6 weeks after discharge. Primaryoutcome evaluated was drug-induced complete expulsion ofProducts of Conception (POCs). Secondary outcomes measuredwere induction expulsion interval, number of doses required,classification of failures, cervical canal permeability in womenrequiring surgical evacuation, side effects, hemoglobindrop, duration and amount of post-abortal bleeding, time ofresumption of menses, experience with side effects, patientsatisfaction and acceptability to treatment.Results: Both routes were highly effective (vaginal=92%,oral= 74%, p=0.032), safe and acceptable with tolerable sideeffects. The mean time to expulsion was longer (13.24hrs) inthe oral than vaginal group (10.87hrs). All 4 unsuccessful casesin vaginal group and 12 of 13 in oral group had permeablecervices prior to surgical evacuation. Most women labeled theside effects as tolerable in both the groups. Overall acceptancerate to treatment was high in both the groups A and B (76%and 70%).Conclusion: Vaginal misoprostol is more effective than oralmisoprostol for first trimester missed abortion.
机译:简介:错过了流产,在最多15%的占所有人的情况下发生临床认可的怀孕是对此关注的原因耐心。虽然过去的许多研究人员比较了管理中的手术和医学方法患者,只有少数人执行了两条航线的评估在同等剂量的米索前列醇治疗前三个月错过了流产。目的:比较米索前列醇对阴道和口服的疗效路线,为妊娠初季的管理失误;并识别米索前列醇对颈部扩张的效用在任何手术终止之前怀孕。材料与方法:随机预期审判,比较米索前列醇,阴道和口服的疗效路线,用于终止妊娠的终止错失堕胎是在妇产科和妇科进行,政府多专业医院,昌迪加一对一年。百分动符合213的纳入标准连续妇女与第一个三个月介绍该研究所错过堕胎被住院治疗。研究参与者被随机分配给两个治疗组中的一个,使用顺序编号的信封,接收400mcg米索前列醇阴道或口服最多三剂分开六个小时,并记录了结果。患者是在出院后的第14天和第6周随后。基本的评估的结果是药物诱发的完全驱逐概念的产品(POC)。测量的二次结果是诱导驱逐间隔,所需剂量数量,失败分类,女性宫颈管渗透性需要外科疏散,副作用,血红蛋白下降,持续时间和后级出血,时间恢复月经,副作用经验,患者治疗的满意度和可接受性。结果:两条路线都非常有效(阴道= 92%,Oral = 74%,P = 0.032),安全可接受的侧面效果。开除的平均时间更长(13.24小时)口服比阴道小组(10.87小时)。所有4个不成功的案件在阴道组和13个中的口腔组中的12个具有可渗透的在外科疏散之前的颈椎。大多数女性都标明了副作用在两个组中都可以容忍。总体接受A和B组的治疗率高(76%和70%)。结论:阴道米索前列醇比口腔更有效米索前斯莫斯莫司醇为第一个三个月错过了堕胎。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sheeba Marwah;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号