首页> 外文OA文献 >Guideline use among different healthcare professionals in diagnosing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Dutch children; who cares?
【2h】

Guideline use among different healthcare professionals in diagnosing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Dutch children; who cares?

机译:不同医疗专业人士在荷兰儿童中诊断注意力缺陷多动障碍的指南中使用指南;谁在乎?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Objective Current data about Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Deficiency (ADHD) guideline use in the Netherlands are absent. This study analysed ADHD guideline use among different healthcare workers, and the use of key elements from these guidelines to diagnose ADHD. Method A survey assessing ADHD guideline use was distributed throughout the Netherlands to various health care professionals. Only professionals involved during the diagnostic process were included. Results Response rate among GPs was low (111/1450), but high among other health care professionals (251/287). A total of 362 surveys were analysed, 186 responders (51%) were involved during the diagnostic process. Overall guideline use was 64.5%; the national multidisciplinary guideline or a guideline made by a professional’s own institution were most used. Psychiatrists, psychologists and paediatricians reported compliance with key elements of the guidelines such as gathering information from a third party (> 90%) and carrying out a developmental history (> 88%). Use of a standardized interview (< 52% often use) was low. Only paediatricians performed a physical examination regularly (88%). Conclusion Despite low general use of guidelines, psychiatrists, psychologists and paediatricians use similar key elements of ADHD guidelines. This study provides opportunities to improve care through increasing familiarity with ADHD guidelines and the use of standardized interviews.
机译:摘要目前目前关于注意力缺陷多动缺陷(ADHD)指南的目前缺乏。本研究分析了不同医疗工作者的ADHD指南,以及从这些指南使用关键要素来诊断ADHD。方法评估ADHD指南使用的调查分布在整个荷兰到各种医疗保健专业人员。仅包括在诊断过程中参与的专业人士。结果GPS之间的响应率低(111/1450),但在其他医疗保健专业人员(251/287)中很高。分析了362例调查,在诊断过程中涉及186名响应者(51%)。总体指南使用是64.5%;最专业机构所作的国家多学科指南或指引最多。精神病学家,心理学家和儿科医生报告遵守指导方针的关键要素,如从第三方(> 90%)的信息收集信息,并进行发展历史(> 88%)。使用标准化访谈(<52%通常使用)很低。只有儿科医生定期进行体检(88%)。结论尽管普遍使用指南,精神病学家,心理学家和儿科医生使用类似ADHD指南的类似关键要素。本研究提供了通过增加熟悉ADHD指南和使用标准面试的熟悉来改善护理的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号