首页> 外文OA文献 >Differentiating Small (≤1 cm) Focal Liver Lesions as Metastases or Cysts by means of Computed Tomography: A Case-Study to Illustrate a Fuzzy Logic-Based Method to Assess the Impact of Diagnostic Confidence on Radiological Diagnosis
【2h】

Differentiating Small (≤1 cm) Focal Liver Lesions as Metastases or Cysts by means of Computed Tomography: A Case-Study to Illustrate a Fuzzy Logic-Based Method to Assess the Impact of Diagnostic Confidence on Radiological Diagnosis

机译:通过计算机断层扫描将小(≤1cm)焦肝病变分化为转移或囊肿:一个案例研究,以说明基于模糊的逻辑的方法来评估诊断信心对放射诊断的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. To quantify the impact of diagnostic confidence on radiological diagnosis with a fuzzy logic-based method. Materials and Methods. Twenty-two oncologic patients with 20 cysts and 30 metastases ≤1 cm in size found at 64-row computed tomography were included. Two readers (R1/R2) expressed diagnoses as a subjective level of confidence P(d) in malignancy within the interval [0,1] rather than on a “crisp” basis (malignant/benign); confidence in benignancy was 1-p(d). When cross-tabulating data according to the standard of reference, 2×2 table cells resulted from the aggregation between p(d)/1-p(d) and final diagnosis. We then assessed (i) readers diagnostic performance on a fuzzy and crisp basis; (ii) the “divergence” δ(F,C) (%) as a measure of how confidence impacted on crisp diagnosis. Results. Diagnoses expressed with lower confidence increased fuzzy false positives compared to crisp ones (from 0 to 0.2 for R1; from 1 to 2.4 for R2). Crisp/fuzzy accuracy was 94.0%/93.6% (R1) and 94.0/91.6% (R2). δ(F,C) (%) was larger in the case of the less experienced reader (R2) (up to +7.95% for specificity). According to simulations, δ(F,C) (%) was negative/positive depending on the level of confidence in incorrect diagnoses. Conclusion. Fuzzy evaluation shows a measurable effect of uncertainty on radiological diagnoses.
机译:目的。用模糊逻辑的方法量化诊断信心对放射性诊断的影响。材料和方法。包括22例患有20个囊肿和30个转移率≤1厘米的抑制患者,其中尺寸为64行计算断层扫描。两名读者(R1 / R2)表达诊断为间隔内恶性肿声P(d)的主观置信度P(d),而不是“清脆”(恶性/良性);对良性的信心是1-P(d)。当根据参考标准交叉制结数据,由P(d)/ 1-p(d)之间的聚集和最终诊断产生2×2表细胞。然后,我们评估(i)读者在模糊和清晰的基础上诊断性能; (ii)“分歧”δ(F,C)(%)作为对如何对清脆诊断产生的信心的衡量标准。结果。与脆弱的模糊阳性的诊断增加模糊阳性较高(从0到0.2,R1为0.1至2.4)。清脆/模糊的准确性为94.0%/ 93.6%(R1)和94.0 / 91.6%(R2)。在经验较少的读取器(R2)(特异性最高+ 7.95%)的情况下,δ(F,C)(%)较大。根据模拟,根据错误诊断的置信水平,δ(F,C)(%)是负/阳性。结论。模糊评价显示了不确定性对放射学诊断的可测量效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号