首页> 外文OA文献 >Substitution of outpatient hospital care with specialist care in the primary care setting: A systematic review on quality of care, health and costs
【2h】

Substitution of outpatient hospital care with specialist care in the primary care setting: A systematic review on quality of care, health and costs

机译:在初级保健环境中替代专业护理的门诊医院护理:对护理质量,健康和成本进行系统审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Rationale, aims and objectiveSubstituting outpatient hospital care with primary care is seen as a solution to decrease unnecessary referrals to outpatient hospital care and decrease rising healthcare costs. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects on quality of care, health and costs outcomes of substituting outpatient hospital care with primary care-based interventions, which are performed by medical specialists in face-to-face consultations in a primary care setting.MethodThe systematic review was performed using the PICO framework. Original papers in which the premise of the intervention was to substitute outpatient hospital care with primary care through the involvement of a medical specialist in a primary care setting were eligible.ResultsA total of 14 papers were included. A substitution intervention in general practitioner (GP) practices was described in 11 papers, three described a joint consultation intervention in which GPs see patients together with a medical specialist. This study showed that substitution initiatives result mostly in favourable outcomes compared to outpatient hospital care. The initiatives resulted mostly in shorter waiting lists, shorter clinic waiting times and higher patient satisfaction. Costs for treating one extra patient seemed to be higher in the intervention settings. This was mainly caused by inefficient planning of consultation hours and lower patient numbers.ConclusionsDespite the fact that internationally a lot has been written about the importance of performing substitution interventions in which preventing unnecessary referrals to outpatient hospital care was the aim, only 14 papers were included. Future systematic reviews should focus on the effects on the Triple Aim of substitution initiatives in which other healthcare professions than medical specialists are involved along with new technologies, such as e-consults. Additionally, to gain more insight into the effects of substitution initiatives operating in a dynamic healthcare context, it is important to keep evaluating the interventions in a longitudinal study design.
机译:理由,针对初级保健的门诊医院护理被视为降低不必要的公诊到门诊病人护理和减少上升的医疗保健费用的解决方案。该系统审查旨在评估与初级保健干预措施替代门诊医院护理的护理,健康和成本结果的影响,这些干预措施由医学专家在初级保健环境中面对面磋商中进行。方法查看使用Pico框架进行。原文中,干预的前提是通过初级保健环境中的医学专家参与初级保健的初级保健,符合条件。委员会共有14篇论文的委员会。在11篇论文中描述了一般从业者(GP)实践中的替代干预,三篇论文中描述了一个联合咨询干预,其中GPS将患者与医学专家一起进行。这项研究表明,与门诊医院护理相比,替代倡议主要是有利的结果。该举措主要导致较短的等待名单,较短的诊所等待时间和更高的患者满意度。治疗额外患者的费用似乎在干预设置中更高。这主要是由咨询时间和更低患者编号的低效规划造成的.ClusionsdionsDespite在国际上写了关于履行替代干预的重要性的事实,在这种情况下,预防门诊医院护理的不必要的转介是目的,只有14篇论文。未来的系统审查应侧重于对替代倡议的三重目的的影响,其中其他医疗专业教授与医学专家一起参与其中,如电子咨询。此外,为了更有洞察力对替代计划在动态医疗背景下运作的替代计划的影响,重要的是要在纵向研究设计中评估干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号