首页> 外文OA文献 >LOCKING INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL VERSUS PLATE AND SCREWS FOR FIXATION IN TIBIAL DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURE
【2h】

LOCKING INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL VERSUS PLATE AND SCREWS FOR FIXATION IN TIBIAL DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURE

机译:锁定髓内钉与板材和螺钉,用于固定胫骨膜炎骨折

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Diaphyseal tibial fracture is the most common fractured long bone because of it is subcutaneous position anteromedially and thinner diaphysis distally. Tibial diaphysis has poor blood supply and poor soft tissue envelope around it so it is more susceptible to infection, delay union, and non-union. For these reasons many modalities including cast and brace, external fixation, plate and screws, and locking intramedullary nail were used for treating diaphyseal tibial fracture. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of locking intramedullary nail(LIMN) fixation versus plate and screws fixation in treating diaphyseal tibial fracture in term of operation time, early weight bearing, time to union, and complications. The study was carried out in Sulaimaniyah Teaching Hospital, Department of Orthopedics prospectively from May 2010 to July 2014 on 74 patients, 40 of them underwent surgical fixation by locking intramedullary nail (26 close method and 14 by open method), and 34 of them underwent open reduction and internal fixation by plate and screws. The outcome was assessed by clinical and radiological evaluation. The results show that young male are more affected by trauma, and the main mechanism of injury was Road Traffic Accident. Operation time was shorter among plate and screws group with a mean of 51.4±4.9 minutes, than locking intramedullary nail group with a mean of 88.5±12.5 minutes. Weight bearing(WB) time achieved earlier in the locking intramedullary nail group with a mean of 2.6±0.8 weeks than the plate and screws group with a mean of 4.2±1.4 weeks. There were no significant difference between the two groups regarding time to full weight bearing(FWB), time to union, and complications. In conclusion, Locking intramedullary nail and plate fixation are ideal option for treatment of diaphyseal tibial fractures since there were no significant differences between them in time of union and the post-operative complications.
机译:摘要椎间性胫骨骨折是最常见的骨折长骨,因为它是皮下位置和透析晶体的远端。胫骨晶体伴有血液供应差,差距差,所以它更容易受到感染,延误和非联盟。由于这些原因,许多模态包括铸造和支架,外固定,板材和螺钉,以及锁定髓内钉子用于治疗椎间性胫骨骨折。本研究的目的是比较锁定髓内钉(LiMn)固定的结果与平板和螺钉固定在操作时间,早期重量轴承,联合时间和并发症的时间内治疗透析性胫骨骨折。该研究是在2010年5月至2014年5月至2014年7月的74例患者中,通过锁定髓内钉(通过开放方法26℃下进行26例,其中34名患者,其中34名患者进行了74例患者的骨科教学医院板材和螺钉打开和内部固定。通过临床和放射性评估评估结果。结果表明,年轻男性受到创伤的影响,伤害的主要机制是道路交通事故。在板材和螺钉组之间的操作时间较短,平均为51.4±4.9分钟,而不是锁定髓内钉组,其平均为88.5±12.5分钟。在锁定髓内钉组中提前达到的重量轴承(WB)时间比平板和螺钉组为2.6±0.8周,平均为4.2±1.4周。两组关于全重轴承(FWB)的时间没有显着差异,联合时间和并发症。总之,锁定髓内钉和板固定是治疗椎间度胫骨骨折的理想选择,因为它们在工会时期与手术后并发症之间没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号