首页> 外文OA文献 >Theoretical and Experimental Gas Volume Quantification of Micro- and Nanobubble Ultrasound Contrast Agents
【2h】

Theoretical and Experimental Gas Volume Quantification of Micro- and Nanobubble Ultrasound Contrast Agents

机译:微型和纳米柔臼超声造影剂的理论和实验气体量定量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The amount of gas in ultrasound contrast agents is related to their acoustic activity. Because of this relationship, gas volume has been used as a key variable in normalizing the in vitro and in vivo acoustic behavior of lipid shell-stabilized bubbles with different sizes and shell components. Despite its importance, bubble gas volume has typically only been theoretically calculated based on bubble size and concentration that is typically measured using the Coulter counter for microbubbles and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) for nanoscale bubbles. However, while these methods have been validated for the analysis of liquid or solid particles, their application in bubble analysis has not been rigorously studied. We have previously shown that resonant mass measurement (RMM) may be a better-suited technique for sub-micron bubble analysis, as it can measure both buoyant and non-buoyant particle size and concentration. Here, we provide validation of RMM bubble analysis by using headspace gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) to experimentally measure the gas volume of the bubble samples. This measurement was then used as ground truth to test the accuracy of theoretical gas volume predictions based on RMM, NTA (for nanobubbles), and Coulter counter (for microbubbles) measurements. The results show that the headspace GC/MS gas volume measurements agreed well with the theoretical predictions for the RMM of nanobubbles but not NTA. For nanobubbles , the theoretical gas volume using RMM was 10% lower than the experimental GC/MS measurements; meanwhile, using NTA resulted in an 82% lower predicted gas volume. For microbubbles, the experimental gas volume from the GC/MS measurements was 27% lower compared to RMM and 72% less compared to the Coulter counter results. This study demonstrates that the gas volume of nanobubbles and microbubbles can be reliably measured using headspace GC/MS to validate bubble size measurement techniques. We also conclude that the accuracy of theoretical predictions is highly dependent on proper size and concentration measurements.
机译:气体在超声造影剂的量与他们的声音活动。因为这种关系,气体体积已归一化在体外和在具有不同尺寸和壳部件脂质壳稳定气泡的体内声学特性用作密钥可变。尽管它的重要性,气泡的气体体积已通常仅在理论上计算基于被使用用于微气泡和纳米级气泡纳米粒子追踪分析(NTA)库尔特计数来测量气泡的大小和浓度。然而,虽然这些方法已被验证的用于液体或固体颗粒的分析,它们在泡沫分析中的应用还没有被严格地研究。我们以前曾表明,共振质量测量(RMM)可以是用于亚微米气泡分析更好的适合的技术,因为它可以同时测量浮力和非漂浮的颗粒大小和浓度。在这里,我们通过使用顶空气相色谱/质谱(GC / MS)通过实验测量泡沫样品的气体体积提供RMM气泡分析的验证。然后,该测量被用作基础事实来测试基于RMM,NTA(用于纳米气泡)的理论气体体积的预测,和库尔特计数器(用于微泡)测量的精确度。结果表明,顶空GC / MS气体体积测量与纳米气泡的RMM理论预测而不是NTA吻合。对于纳米气泡,使用RMM理论气体体积为10%比实验GC / MS测量降低;同时,使用NTA导致了82%的较低的预测气体体积。对于微泡,从GC / MS测量实验的气体体积为27%下相比RMM和72%以下相比库尔特计数结果。这项研究表明,纳米气泡和微泡的气体体积可以使用顶空GC / MS,以验证气泡尺寸测量技术来可靠地计量。我们还得出结论,理论预测的准确性是高度依赖于适当的大小和浓度测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号