首页> 外文OA文献 >Sunlight alone is not a disinfectant: Consent and the futility of opening Big Data black boxes (without assistance)
【2h】

Sunlight alone is not a disinfectant: Consent and the futility of opening Big Data black boxes (without assistance)

机译:仅阳光不是消毒剂:同意和开设大数据黑匣子的无用(无需帮助)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In our attempts to achieve privacy and reputation deliverables, advocating for service providers and other data managers to open Big Data black boxes and be more transparent about consent processes, algorithmic details, and data practice is easy. Moving from this call to meaningful forms of transparency, where the Big Data details are available, useful, and manageable is more difficult. Most challenging is moving from that difficult task of meaningful transparency to the seemingly impossible scenario of achieving, consistently and ubiquitously, meaningful forms of consent, where individuals are aware of data practices and implications, understand these realities, and agree to them as well. This commentary unpacks these concerns in the online consent context. It emphasizes that self-governance fallacy pervades current approaches to achieving digital forms of privacy, exemplified by the assertion that transparency and information access alone are enough to help individuals achieve privacy and reputation protections.
机译:我们试图实现隐私和声誉可交付成果,倡导服务提供商和其他数据经理打开大数据黑匣子,并且对同意过程,算法详细信息和数据练习更加透明。从此调用转变为有意义的透明度形式,其中大数据细节可用,有用,可管理更困难。最具挑战性的是从这件事的透明度转变为看似不可能的透明度,以看似不可能的方式,始终如一地达到,始终如一地,有意义的同意形式,个人都知道数据实践和影响,了解这些现实,并同意他们。此评论在在线同意背景下解压缩这些问题。它强调,自治谬误遍及实现数字形式隐私的目前的方法,示出了单独的透明度和信息访问足以帮助个人实现隐私和声誉保护。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jonathan A. Obar;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2020
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号