首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of the clinical and MRI features of patients with hepatic hemangioma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, or angiosarcoma
【2h】

Comparison of the clinical and MRI features of patients with hepatic hemangioma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, or angiosarcoma

机译:肝血管瘤患者临床和MRI特征的比较,上皮血管血管瘤或Agiosarcoma

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Comparisons of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE), hepatic hemangioma, and hepatic angiosarcoma (HAS) have rarely been reported. The purpose of our study was to analyze the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of these conditions. Methods A total of 57 patients (25 with hemangioma, 13 with HEHE, and 19 with HAS) provided hepatic vascular endothelial cell data between June 2006 and May 2017. Results The proportions of cases with circumscribed margins were 88% (22/25), 84.6% (11/13), and 31.6% (6/19) for hemangioma, HEHE, and HAS, respectively (P < 0.001). HAS lesions were less likely to have circumscribed margins. The proportions of lesions with hemorrhaging were 4% (1/25), 30.8% (4/13), and 36.8% (7/19) for hemangioma, HEHE, and HAS, respectively (P = 0.014). HEHE and HAS cases were more likely to show heterogeneous signals on T1-weighted (T1WI) MRI. HEHE and HAS cases were more likely to show heterogeneous signals on T2-weighted (T2WI) MRI. Centripetal enhancement was the most common pattern in vascular tumors, with proportions of 100, 46.2% (6/13), and 68.4% (13/19) for hemangioma, HEHE, and HAS, respectively. The difference in enhancement pattern between HEHE and HAS was not significant, but rim enhancement was more common for HEHE (46.2%, 6/13). Conclusions Our study revealed clinical and imaging differences between HEHE and HAS. The platelet count (PLT) and coagulation function of the HAS group decreased, whereas the alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level increased. The 5-year survival rate for HAS was significantly lower than that of HEHE. A higher malignancy degree indicated a more blurred lesion margin, easier occurrence of hemorrhaging, and more heterogeneous T1WI and T2WI signals.
机译:摘要肝上皮血管瘤(Hehe),肝血管瘤和肝​​癌(具有)的背景比较很少。我们研究的目的是分析这些条件的临床和磁共振成像(MRI)结果。方法共有57名患者(25例血管瘤,13人和195例,有19例)在2006年6月和2017年5月期间提供了肝血管内皮细胞数据。结果,患有外缘边值的病例的比例为88%(22/25), 84.6%(11/13)和31.6%(6/19)用于血管瘤,Hehe,并分别具有(P <0.001)。病变不太可能有否定的边缘。具有出血的病变的比例为4%(1/25),30.8%(4/13)和36.8%(7/19),分别为何Hehe,并且具有(P = 0.014)。 Hehe和病例更有可能在T1加权(T1WI)MRI上显示异质信号。 Hehe和病例更有可能在T2加权(T2WI)MRI上显示异质信号。向心增强是血管肿瘤中最常见的模式,比例为100,46.2%(6/13)和68.4%(13/19),分别为何Hehe,呵呵,并且具有。呵呵之间的增强模式的差异并不重要,但RIM增强对于呵呵更常见(46.2%,6/13)。结论我们的研究揭示了呵呵之间的临床和成像差异。具有组的血小板计数(PLT)和凝固功能降低,而α-胎儿(AFP)水平增加。 5年的生存率已经明显低于呵呵。更高的恶性程度表明了更具模糊的病变余量,更容易出现出血,更加异质的T1WI和T2WI信号。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号