首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative efficacy of the Leucofeligen™ FeLV/RCP and Purevax™ RCP FeLV vaccines against infection with circulating feline Calicivirus
【2h】

Comparative efficacy of the Leucofeligen™ FeLV/RCP and Purevax™ RCP FeLV vaccines against infection with circulating feline Calicivirus

机译:Leucofeligen™FELV / RCP和PureVAX™RCP Felv疫苗对循环猫油系物感染的比较疗效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Feline calicivirus (FCV) is a common virus, found worldwide, mainly responsible for chronic ulceroproliferative faucitis and periodontitis. This virus has a high mutation rate, leading to the presence of numerous FCV strains in the field. The objectives of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two vaccines (Leucofeligen™ FeLV/RCP and Purevax™ RCP FeLV), which differ by their nature (live vs. inactivated) and the vaccinal strains, against circulating FCV strains. Thirty 9-week-old specific pathogen free (SPF) kittens were thus randomised into 3 groups and were either not vaccinated (control) or vaccinated (2 injections, 3 weeks apart) with one of the vaccines. Four weeks after the second injection of primary vaccination, the cats were inoculated with a pathogenic strain representative of the ones circulating in Europe (FCV-FR4_01) and followed for 2 weeks. Results After challenge, significant differences (p < 0.05) between control cats and cats vaccinated with Leucofeligen™ FeLV/RCP or Purevax™ RCP FeLV were observed for body weight variation, rectal temperature rise and maximum clinical scores, reflecting the intensity of the signs (83% and 67% lower in the respective vaccinated groups than in the control group). Significant differences were observed between the vaccinated groups, as cats vaccinated with Leucofeligen™ FeLV/RCP had a lower temperature rise (p < 0.05 at days post-challenge 3 to 5) and lower virus shedding titres (p < 0.05 at days post-challenge 8, 9 and 11) than cats vaccinated with Purevax™ RCP FeLV. Finally, only cats vaccinated with Leucofeligen™ FeLV/RCP had a significantly lower cumulative score, reflecting the intensity and duration of calicivirosis clinical signs, than the control cats (77% lower vs. 62% lower for cats vaccinated with Purevax™ RCP FeLV). Conclusions Both vaccines, Leucofeligen™ FeLV/RCP and Purevax™ RCP FeLV, were found to be efficacious in reducing clinical signs induced by FCV-FR4_01, a FCV strain representative of the circulating ones. However, cats vaccinated with Leucofeligen™ FeLV/RCP were able to control the infection more efficiently than those vaccinated with Purevax™ RCP FeLV, as evidenced by the shorter duration of clinical signs and lower viral titre in excretions.
机译:摘要背景猫科西米尔(FCV)是一个常见的病毒,在全球范围内发现,主要负责慢性溃疡性的牙科炎和牙周炎。该病毒具有高突变率,导致该领域存在许多FCV菌株。本研究的目标是评估和比较两个疫苗(Leucofeligen™FELV / RCP和PureVax™RCP Felv)的疗效,这因其性质(活性与灭活)和疫苗菌株而异,抗循环FCV菌株。因此,将三十周年的特异性病原体(SPF)小块随机分为3组,并没有接种疫苗(对照)或用其中一种疫苗接种(对照)或接种疫苗(相隔3周)。在第二次注射一次初期接种后四周,用代表欧洲循环的病原菌菌株接种猫(FCV-FR4_01)并随访2周。结果在挑战后,对照猫和用Leucofeligen™Felv / RCP或PureVAX™RCP Felv接种的对照猫和猫之间的显着差异(P <0.05)进行体重变化,直肠温度上升和最大临床评分,反映了标志的强度(相应疫苗基团的83%和67%低于对照组)。疫苗基团之间观察到显着的差异,因为用Leucofeligen™FELV / RCP接种的猫患有较低的温度升高(在攻击后3至5天,攻击后的挑战后的P <0.05)和降低病毒脱落滴度(P <0.05) 8,9和11)比用pureVax™RCP Felv接种疫苗的猫。最后,只有用Leucofeligen™FELV / RCP接种疫苗的累积评分显着降低,反映了临床症状的强度和持续时间,而不是用PureVax™RCP Felv接种疫苗的猫的对照猫(77%降低62%) 。结论疫苗,LeucofeLigen™Felv / RCP和PureVax™RCP Felv被发现在减少FCV-FR4_01,代表循环循环的FCV菌株诱导的临床症状中的有效性。然而,用Leucofeligen™FELV / RCP接种疫苗的猫能够比用PureVax™RCP Felv疫苗的那些更有效地控制感染,如临床症状持续时间和降低排泄中的病毒滴度较短的那样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号