首页> 外文OA文献 >Safety management of waterway congestions under dynamic risk conditions—A case study of the Yangtze River
【2h】

Safety management of waterway congestions under dynamic risk conditions—A case study of the Yangtze River

机译:动态风险条件下水路拥堵的安全管理 - 以长江为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With the continuous increase of traffic volume in recent years, inland waterway transportation suffers more and more from congestion problems, which form a major impediment to its development. Thus, it is of great significance for the stakeholders and decision makers to address these congestion issues properly. Fuzzy Techniques for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is widely used for solving Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) problems with ambiguity. When taking into account fuzzy TOPSIS, decisions are made in a static scenario with fixed weights assigned to the criteria. However, risk conditions usually vary in real-life cases, which will inevitably affect the preference ranking of the alternatives. To make flexible decisions according to the dynamics of congestion risks and to achieve a rational risk analysis for prioritising congestion risk control options (RCOs), the cost-benefit ratio (CBR) is used in this paper to reflect the change of risk conditions. The hybrid of CBR and fuzzy TOPSIS is illustrated by investigating the congestion risks of the Yangtze River. The ranking of RCOs varies depending on the scenarios with different congestion risk conditions. The research findings indicate that some RCOs (e.g. “Channel dredging and maintenance”, and “Prohibition of navigation”) are more cost effective in the situation of a high level of congestion risk, while the other RCOs (e.g. “Loading restriction”, and “Crew management and training”) are more beneficial in a relatively low congestion risk condition. The proposed methods and the evaluation results provide useful insights for effective safety management of the inland waterway congestions under dynamic risk conditions. © 2017 Elsevier B.V.
机译:随着近年来交通量的不断增加,内陆水路运输越来越多地来自拥堵问题,这构成了其发展的主要障碍。因此,利益攸关方和决策者可以正确解决这些拥堵问题是具有重要意义。通过相似性与理想解决方案(TOPSIS)的命令偏好的模糊技术广泛用于解决与歧义的多标准决策(MCDM)问题。考虑到模糊TopSIS时,在静态场景中进行决策,该静态方案具有分配给标准的固定权重。然而,风险条件通常在现实生活案件中变化,这将不可避免地影响替代方案的偏好排名。为了使灵活的决定根据拥堵风险的动态,并实现优先考虑拥塞风险控制选项(RCO)的合理风险分析,本文使用成本效益比(CBR)来反映风险条件的变化。通过调查长江的拥堵风险来说明CBR和模糊Tootsis的杂种。 RCO的排名根据具有不同拥塞风险条件的情况而异。研究结果表明,一些RCO(例如“通道疏浚和维护”,以及“禁止导航”)在高水平拥堵风险的情况下更具成本效益,而其他RCO(例如“装载限制”,以及“船员管理和培训”)在相对低的拥堵风险条件下更有益。所提出的方法和评估结果为动态风险条件下的内陆水路拥堵有效安全管理提供了有用的见解。 ©2017 Elsevier B.v.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号