首页> 外文OA文献 >Volunteers in the Smart City: Comparison of Contribution Strategies on Human-Centered Measures
【2h】

Volunteers in the Smart City: Comparison of Contribution Strategies on Human-Centered Measures

机译:智能城市的志愿者:以人为本的措施贡献策略比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Provision of smart city services often relies on users contribution, e.g., of data, which can be costly for the users in terms of privacy. Privacy risks, as well as unfair distribution of benefits to the users, should be minimized as they undermine user participation, which is crucial for the success of smart city applications. This paper investigates privacy, fairness, and social welfare in smart city applications by means of computer simulations grounded on real-world data, i.e., smart meter readings and participatory sensing. We generalize the use of public good theory as a model for resource management in smart city applications, by proposing a design principle that is applicable across application scenarios, where provision of a service depends on user contributions. We verify its applicability by showing its implementation in two scenarios: smart grid and traffic congestion information system. Following this design principle, we evaluate different classes of algorithms for resource management, with respect to human-centered measures, i.e., privacy, fairness and social welfare, and identify algorithm-specific trade-offs that are scenario independent. These results could be of interest to smart city application designers to choose a suitable algorithm given a scenario-specific set of requirements, and to users to choose a service based on an algorithm that matches their privacy preferences.
机译:智能城市服务的提供往往依赖于用户的贡献,例如,数据,它可以是昂贵的用户隐私条款。隐私风险,以及利益分配不公的用户,因为他们破坏了用户的参与,这是智能城市应用成功的关键,应尽量减少。本文研究的隐私性,公平性和社会福利在智能城市的应用通过接地真实世界的数据,即智能电表读数和参与式感知计算机模拟的手段。我们推广使用公共物品理论作为智能城市应用中的资源管理的模式,通过提出一个设计原则是适用于整个应用场景,在提供服务的依赖于用户贡献。智能电网和交通堵塞信息系统:我们通过展示其实施在两种情况下验证其适用性。根据这一设计原则,我们评估了不同类别的算法资源管理,对于以人为本的措施,即隐私,公平和社会福利,并确定具体的算法,取舍是场景独立。这些结果可能会感兴趣的智慧城市应用设计人员选择给出了具体的方案集的要求合适的算法,以及用户选择基于一个算法匹配他们的隐私偏好的服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号