首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of hybrid regression and multivariate regression in the regional flood frequency analysis: A case study in Khorasan Razavi province
【2h】

Comparison of hybrid regression and multivariate regression in the regional flood frequency analysis: A case study in Khorasan Razavi province

机译:区域洪水频率分析中杂交回归与多元回归的比较 - 以霍罗桑·拉扎维省为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Magnitude, rate and frequency of the stochastic and unexpected events are of greatsignificance and importance in hydrology. Nowadays, for economic planning of the projects, the useof analytical methods of unexpected events in hydrology is unavoidable. The aim of this study was tocompare hybrid regression and multivariate regression to estimate flood peak discharge in the provinceof Khorasan Razavi and in the selected water measured stations.Methods: For this purpose, 19 hydrometric stations were selected and analyzed. In the first step, therate of peak discharge was estimated with different return periods and by selecting the best regionaldistribution (lognormal distribution type ΠΙ). In the next step, independent and important variablesincluding area, mean annual rainfall, the average height of the watershed and its slope were determinedusing functional analysis and using SPSS software version 22. Then, two hydrologically homogeneousregions were determined by homogeneity test using cluster analysis, and accordingly, two models werepresented for the whole area and also for homogeneous areas. To compare and evaluate the accuracyand efficiency of the estimated models, the rates of discharges were estimated and compared withobservational rates using three control watersheds. To compare models, it was used from the averageabsolute values of the relative error index.Results: It was revealed that the hybrid method was more accurate than the multivariate regressionmethod in the return period of 50 years and provides better results of flood discharges for the area.Homogenous areas had a higher coefficient of determination (R2) and lower relative standard error(RSE) compared to the whole area. It was also revealed that with increase of return period, the rates ofR2 decreased but the rates of relative standard error increased.Conclusion: The accuracy of multivariate regression and hybrid methods was the same in the 25-yearreturn period. In the present study, the importance and necessity of homogenous areas compared withthe model of the whole area are completely evident.
机译:背景:随机和意外事件的幅度,速率和频率很大水文中的意义和重要性。如今,对于项目的经济规划,使用水文中意外事件的分析方法是不可避免的。这项研究的目的是比较混合回归和多元回归来估算省内洪水峰卸货Khorasan Razavi和所选水位测量站。方法:为此目的,选择并分析19个液体站。在第一步,峰值放电率估计不同的返回期,并通过选择最佳区域分布(逻辑正式分布π1)。在下一步中,独立和重要的变量包括地区,平均年降雨量,分水岭的平均高度及其坡度确定使用功能分析和使用SPSS软件版本22.然后,两个水文均匀通过聚类分析通过均匀性测试确定区域,因此,两种模型是为整个地区提供,也适用于均匀区域。比较和评估准确性估计模型的效率,估计放电率并比较使用三个控制流域的观察率。要比较模型,它是从平均使用的相对错误索引的绝对值。结果:揭示了混合方法比多变量回归更准确返回期50年的方法,为该地区提供了更好的洪水排放结果。均匀区域具有更高的测定系数(R2)和更低的相对标准误差(RSE)与整个区域相比。还有人透露,随着回报期的增加,率R2减少,但相对标准误差的速率增加。结论:25年的多元回归和混合方法的准确性是相同的返回期。在本研究中,与之相比的同质区域的重要性和必要性整个区域的模型完全明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号