首页> 外文OA文献 >What Support do Systematic Reviews Provide for Evidence-informed Teaching about Software Engineering Practice?
【2h】

What Support do Systematic Reviews Provide for Evidence-informed Teaching about Software Engineering Practice?

机译:系统评价如何提供有关软件工程实践的证据知识教学?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The adoption of the evidence-based research paradigm by software engineering researchers has created a growing knowledge base provided by the outcomes from systematic reviews. Aim: We set out to identify and catalogue a sample of the knowledge provided by systematic reviews, to determine what support they can provide for an evidence-informed approach to teaching about software engineering practice. Method: We undertook a tertiary study (a mapping study of systematic reviews) covering the period to the end of 2015. We identified and catalogued those reviews that had findings or made recommendations that were considered relevant to teaching about industry practice. Results: We examined a sample of 276 systematic reviews, selecting 49 for which we could clearly identify practice-oriented findings and recommendations that were supported by the data analysis provided in the review. We have classified these against established software engineering education knowledge categories and discuss the extent and forms of knowledge provided for each category. Conclusion: While systematic reviews can provide knowledge that can inform teaching about practice, relatively few systematic reviews present the outcomes in a form suitable for this purpose. Using a suitable format for presenting a summary of outcomes could improve this. Additionally, the increasing number of published systematic reviews suggests that there is a need for greater coordination regarding the cataloguing of their findings and recommendations.
机译:背景:软件工程研究人员采用基于证据的研究范式创造了系统评价结果提供的不断增长的知识库。目的:我们开始识别和编目系统评论提供的知识样本,以确定他们可以提供哪些支持,以提供有关软件工程实践教学的证据方式。方法:我们承担了一项高等教育研究(对系统评论的映射研究),涵盖了2015年底的期限。我们确定并编目了这些审查,这些评论有与教学有关的关于行业实践的教学。结果:我们审查了276个系统评价的样本,选择49,我们可以清楚地确定审查中提供的数据分析所支持的惯例导向的调查结果和建议。我们已将这些针对已建立的软件工程教育知识类别分类,并讨论为每个类别提供的知识的程度和形式。结论:虽然系统审查可以提供能够通知教学的知识,但相对较少的系统评价呈现出适合此目的的形式的结果。使用合适的格式呈现结果摘要可以改善这一点。此外,发布的系统评价数量越来越多地表明,有必要更加协调有关其调查结果和建议的编目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号