首页> 外文OA文献 >THE COMPARISON OF READING COMPREHENSION IN DESCRIPTIVE TEXT INSTRUCTION USING CASE STUDY AND ANALYTICAL TEAM OF STUDENTS AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL OF STATE 1 KOTAGAJAH ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013
【2h】

THE COMPARISON OF READING COMPREHENSION IN DESCRIPTIVE TEXT INSTRUCTION USING CASE STUDY AND ANALYTICAL TEAM OF STUDENTS AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL OF STATE 1 KOTAGAJAH ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013

机译:使用案例研究和分析队伍在第1届kotagajah学年学年学生案例研究和分析团队的阅读理解对描述理解的比较2012/2013

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Reading comprehension in descriptive text is the ability students of understanding and interpreting information in a descriptive text correctly or get meaning from written descriptive text based on some aspects. Many techniques presented as a solution in reading comprehension they are Case Study technique and Analytical Team technique. The problem formulation in this research are; (1) Is there any significant difference between using Case Study and Analytical Team toward students’ reading comprehension in descriptive text instruction for the tenth grade students of SMAN 1 Kotagajah (2) Which one is more effective between using Case Study and Analytical Team toward students’ reading comprehension in descriptive text instruction for the tenth grade students of SMAN 1 Kotagajah. The objectives of this research are (1) To know whether there is significant difference between using Case Study and Analytical Team toward students’ reading comprehension in descriptive text instruction for the tenth grade students of SMAN 1 Kotagajah. (2) To find out which one is more effective between using Case Study and Analytical Team toward students’ reading comprehension in descriptive text instruction for the tenth grade students of SMAN 1 Kotagajah.In this research, the researcher uses an experimental design. The kind of design is True Experimental Control Group Pre-test and Post test. Experimental group is taught Case Study and control group taught Analytical Team technique. The population in this research is 694 students. The sample in this research is class X which consists of 2 classes 44 students and each class consist of 22 students are as experimental class and 22 as control class. The writer use cluster stratified random sampling to takes sample. From the accounting of students score on post test, is was gained that at the significant level of 0,01, the tratio is higher than ttable, that is 2,77 for tratio and 2,70 for ttable.The conclusion are; (1) There is significant difference between using Case Study and Analytical Team toward students’ reading comprehension in descriptive text instruction for the tenth grade students of SMAN 1 Kotagajah. (2) Case Study is more effective than Analytical Team toward students’ reading comprehension in descriptive text instruction for the tenth grade students of SMAN 1 Kotagajah. It means that Case Study effective to develop students’ reading comprehension
机译:描述性文本中的阅读理解是能够正确地理解和解释描述性文本中信息的能力,或者根据某些方面获取来自书面描述性文本的含义。许多技术作为阅读理解的解决方案,他们是案例研究技术和分析团队技术。本研究中的问题制定是; (1)使用案例研究和分析团队对Sman 1 Kotagajah(2)的第十年级学生的描述性文本教学中的学生阅读理解之间存在任何显着差异,其中一个在使用案例研究和分析团队对学生之间更有效'唱Sman 1 kotagajah十年级学生描述性文本教学中的阅读理解。本研究的目标是(1)知道使用案例研究和分析团队在Sman 1 kotagajah十分之一学生的描述性文本教学中对学生阅读理解有显着差异。 (2)找出哪一个在使用案例研究和分析团队对Sman 1 Kotagajah的第十级学生的描述性文本教学中的学生阅读理解之间更有效。在本研究中,研究人员使用了实验设计。这种设计是真正的实验控制组预测试和后测试。实验组是教学案例研究和控制组教导分析团队技术。本研究中的人口为694名学生。本研究中的样本是X类,由2个44级学生组成,每个班级由22名学生组成,作为实验班级和22级作为对照类。作者使用群集分层随机采样拍摄样本。从学生的核算中的核算后,获得了0,01的显着水平,Tratio高于TTABLE,即TTATIO为2,77个,TTABLE 2,70。结论是;结论是;结论是; (1)使用案例研究和分析团队对学生阅读理解的描述性文本教学中SMAN 1 Kotagajah的第十年级学生的描述理解有显着差异。 (2)案例研究比分析团队更有效地对学生阅读理解的分析团队,在SMAN 1 Kotagajah的第十年级学生的描述性文本教学中。这意味着案例研究有效地发展学生的阅读理解

著录项

  • 作者

    Eva - Faliyanti;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号