首页> 外文OA文献 >Sampling groundwater fauna: efficiency of rapid assessment methods tested in bores in eastern Australia

【2h】

Sampling groundwater fauna: efficiency of rapid assessment methods tested in bores in eastern Australia

机译：采样地下水动物：在澳大利亚东部钻孔测试的快速评估方法效率

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

著录项
引文网络
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

作者
PETER J. HANCOCK; ANDREW J. BOULTON;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2009
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Sampling groundwater fauna: efficiency of rapid assessment methods tested in bores in eastern Australia [J] . HANCOCK PETER J., BOULTON ANDREW J. Freshwater Biology . 2009,第4期

机译：对地下水动物群进行采样：在澳大利亚东部进行的钻孔测试中快速评估方法的效率
2. Exploring the relationship between sampling efficiency and short-range endemism for groundwater fauna in the Pilbara region, Western Australia [J] . EBERHARD STEFAN M., HALSE STUART A., WILLIAMS MATTHEW R., Freshwater Biology . 2009,第4期

机译：探索西澳大利亚州皮尔巴拉地区地下水动物的采样效率与短期特有性之间的关系
3. Comparison of the efficiency of two methods of sampling bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in Eastern dry zone of Karnataka, India [J] . Arati Pannure, K. Chandrashekara Ecology, Environment and Conservation . 2013,第2期

机译：印度卡纳塔克邦东部干旱区两种蜂群（膜翅目：Apoidea）采样方法的效率比较
4. Quantitative Assessment of Australian Plague Locust Habitats in the Inland of Eastern Australia using RS and GIS Technologies [C] . Haikou Wang Conference on remote sensing for agriculture, ecosystems, and hydrology . 2014

机译：使用RS和GIS技术对澳大利亚东部内陆澳大利亚鼠疫蝗虫栖息地进行定量评估
5. Development and Application of a Rapid, User-Friendly and Inexpensive Method to Detect and Quantify Dehalococcoides mccartyi Genes in Groundwater Samples. [D] . Kanitkar, Yogendra Hemant. 2017

机译：快速，用户友好且廉价的方法来检测和定量地下水样品中的Dehalococcoides mccartyi基因的开发和应用。
6. Rapid assessment of insect fauna based on local knowledge: comparing ecological and ethnobiological methods [O] . Daniele Cristina de Oliveira Lima, Marcelo Alves Ramos, Henrique Costa Hermenegildo da Silva, 2016

机译：根据当地知识快速评估昆虫区系：比较生态学和民族生物学方法
7. The bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are usually performed manually. Recently, the number of samples has increased and the need for automatification has grown. BioMerieux has investigated Vitek2 for this purpose. HUSLAB has assigned us to compare the identification and antimicrobial results with respect to routine methods and Vitek2. Furthermore, we evaluate test reactions, ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase) production and the time what it takes to get results with Vitek2. In this study, we examined a total of 183 bacterial isolates including 76 ESBL-strains, 40 nonfermenting rods, 41 fastidious bacteria and 26 fresh clinical isolates. The results of routine methods were gathered from the patient database and following this, compared to the results given by Vitek2. Vitek2 correctly identified more than 96 f the ESBL-strains and fresh clinical isolates. The results of nonfermenting rods and fastidious bacteri a were 70 oncordant with those of the routine methods. Test reaction results of Api20E were 94 nd Api20NE 70 n concordance with Vitek2 results. Approximately 80 f all Vitek2 antimicrobial results and 90 f ESBL test results were correct. Compared to earlier studies, Vitek2 performed the tests faster than the routine methods. These results suggest that Vitek2 is capable of giving rapid and accurate results. However, nonfermenting rods and fastidious bacteria should be studied further. [O] . Järveläinen Marika, Roslund Iira, Silander Maarit 2006

机译：细菌鉴定和抗菌药敏试验通常是手动进行的。最近，样品的数量增加了，并且对自动化的需求也在增长。 BioMerieux为此进行了Vitek2的研究。 HUSLAB已指派我们比较常规方法和Vitek2的鉴定和抗菌结果。此外，我们还评估了测试反应，ESBL（扩展频谱β-内酰胺酶）的产生以及使用Vitek2获得结果所需的时间。在这项研究中，我们检查了总共183个细菌分离株，包括76个ESBL菌株，40个非发酵棒，41个营养细菌和26个新鲜临床分离株。从患者数据库中收集常规方法的结果，然后将其与Vitek2给出的结果进行比较。 Vitek2正确鉴定出超过96种ESBL菌株和新鲜的临床分离株。与常规方法相比，非发酵棒和精制细菌的结果为70。 Api20E的测试反应结果与Vitek2结果一致为94nd Api20NE 70 n。所有Vitek2抗菌结果约80 f和ESBL测试结果90 f正确。与早期的研究相比，Vitek2的测试速度快于常规方法。这些结果表明Vitek2能够给出快速而准确的结果。但是，应进一步研究非发酵棒和营养细菌。
8. Assessment of Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Techniques in an Energy Development Area: A Test of the Efficiency of Three Macrobenthic Sampling Methods in the White River [R] . Pollard, J. E. , Kinney, W. L. 1979

机译：能源开发区大型无脊椎动物监测技术评估 - 白河三种大型底栖采样方法效率测试

Sampling groundwater fauna: efficiency of rapid assessment methods tested in bores in eastern Australia

著录项

引文网络

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅