首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of allograft decontamination with two different antibiotic cocktails at the Treviso Tissue Bank Foundation
【2h】

Evaluation of allograft decontamination with two different antibiotic cocktails at the Treviso Tissue Bank Foundation

机译:两种不同抗生素鸡尾酒在Treviso组织银行基础上评价同种异体移植净化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Microbiological contamination of retrieved tissues is a critical aspect of allograft safety and tissue banks must continuously implement decontamination procedures to minimize tissue contamination. In this study we compared the decontamination efficacy of a new antibiotic cocktail (cocktail B: BASE medium with Gentamicin, Meropenem and Vancomycin) with the cocktail previously adopted at Treviso Tissue Bank Foundation (FBTV) (cocktail A: RPMI medium with Ceftazidime, Lincomycin, Polymyxin B and Vancomycin). Two decontamination steps were carried out, the first immediately after retrieval, the second after processing. The contamination rate was calculated before processing (Time 1) and cryopreservation (Time 2) for total tissues, musculoskeletal tissues and cardiovascular tissues, and the bacterial species involved were analyzed. Cocktail A was used to decontaminate 3548 tissues, of which 266 were cardiovascular and 3282 musculoskeletal tissues. For cocktail A, total tissue contamination was 18.6% at Time 1 and 0.9% at Time 2, with 15.7% contaminated musculoskeletal tissues at Time 1 and 0.4% at Time 2, respectively, while cardiovascular tissues were 50% contaminated at Time 1 and 6.4% at Time 2. Cocktail B was used to decontaminate 3634 tissues of which 318 were cardiovascular and 3316 musculoskeletal tissues. For cocktail B, total tissue contamination was 8.6% at Time 1 and 0.2% at Time 2, with 7.6% contaminated musculoskeletal tissues at Time 1 and 0.03% at Time 2, respectively. Contamination of cardiovascular tissues was 20.4% at Time 1 and 1.9% at Time 2. Intergroup and intragroup contamination rates decreased statistically significantly (p<0.05). Our results have shown that cocktail B was more effective than cocktail A in killing bacteria in both cardiovascular and musculoskeletal tissues during the two decontamination cycles.
机译:检索到的组织的微生物污染是同种异体移植安全性和组织库的关键方面,必须连续地实施净化程序以最大限度地减少组织污染。在这项研究中,我们将新的抗生素鸡尾酒(鸡尾酒B:基础培养基,梅洛涅姆和万古霉素)进行了比较了预先采用的鸡尾酒(FBTV)(FBTV)(鸡尾酒A:RPMI培养基,Lincomcin,多粘菌素B和万古霉素)。进行了两个去污步骤,在检索后第一次紧接,加工后第二。在加工(时间1)之前计算污染速率,并且对总组织的冷冻保存(时间2),分析肌肉骨骼组织和心血管组织以及所涉及的细菌种类。鸡尾酒A用于去污染3548个组织,其中266个是心血管和3282个肌肉骨骼组织。对于鸡尾酒A,在时间2的时间内,总组织污染为18.6%,分别在1和0.4%的时间内为18.6%,分别在时间2和0.4%,而心血管组织在1和6.4时污染了50%污染%在时间2.鸡尾酒B用于去污染3634个组织,其中318个组织是心血管和3316个肌肉骨骼组织。对于鸡尾酒B,在时间2的时间内,总组织污染为8.6%,分别在17.6%污染的肌肉骨骼组织,分别在时间2和0.03%。在时间1和1.9%时,心血管组织的污染为20.4%。血液组和内核污染率在统计学上显着下降(P <0.05)。我们的研究结果表明,在两个去污循环期间,鸡尾酒B比杀死心血管和肌肉骨骼组织中的细菌更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号