首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessing Residency Applicants’ Communication and Professionalism: Standardized Video Interview Scores Compared to Faculty Gestalt
【2h】

Assessing Residency Applicants’ Communication and Professionalism: Standardized Video Interview Scores Compared to Faculty Gestalt

机译:评估居住申请人的沟通和专业性:与教师格式塔相比标准化的视频面试分数

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: The Association of American Medical Colleges has introduced the Standardized Video Interview (SVI) to assess the communication and professionalism skills of residency applicants to allow a more holistic view of applicants beyond academic performance. Initial data suggests scores are not correlated with academic performance and provide a new measure of applicant attributes. It is not currently known how the SVI compares to existing metrics for assessing communication and professionalism during the interview process. Methods: Applicants to the University of Wisconsin Emergency Medicine Residency program were invited and interviewed without use of the SVI scores or videos. All faculty interviewers were blinded to applicants’ SVI information and asked to rate each applicant on their communication and professionalism on a scale from 1–25 (faculty gestalt score), analogous to the 6–30 scoring used by the SVI. We transformed SVI scores to our 1–25 system (transformed SVI score) for ease of comparison and compared them to faculty gestalt scores as well as applicants’ overall score for all components of their interview day (interview score). Results: We collected data for 125 residency candidates. Each applicant received a faculty gestalt score from up to four faculty interviewers. There was no significant correlation of SVI scores with faculty gestalt scores (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient [r s] (123)=0.09, p=0.30) and no correlation with the overall interview score (r s(123)=0.01, p=0.93). Faculty gestalt scores were correlated positively with interview scores (r s(123)=0.65, p<0.01). Conclusion: SVI scores show no significant correlation with faculty gestalt scores of communication and professionalism. This could relate to bias introduced by knowledge of an applicant’s academic performance, different types of questions being asked by faculty interviewers, or lack of uniform criteria by which faculty assess these competencies. Further research is needed to determine whether SVI scores or faculty gestalt correlate with performance during residency.
机译:介绍:美国医学院协会推出了标准化的视频面试(SVI),以评估居住申请人的沟通和专业技能,以便更全面地看申请人超越学术绩效。初始数据表明得分与学术绩效无关,并提供了申请人属性的新措施。目前尚未知道SVI如何与在访谈过程中评估沟通和专业性的现有度量。方法:威斯康星大学申请人应急医学居住计划邀请和采访,不使用SVI分数或视频。所有教师面试官都蒙蔽了申请人的SVI信息,并要求将每位申请人的沟通和专业性的评估从1-25(教师GeLtalt评分)的沟通和专业人士评估,类似于SVI使用的6-30次得分。我们将SVI分数转换为我们的1-25系统(转换SVI得分)以易于比较,并将其与教师的总成绩和申请人进行了比较,适用于受访日的所有组成部分(面试得分)。结果:我们收集了125名居住候选人的数据。每位申请人都收到了从最多四名教师面试官的教师得分。 SVI分数与教师得分没有显着相关性(Spearman的等级相关系数[Rs](123)= 0.09,p = 0.30),与整个面试评分没有相关性(Rs(123)= 0.01,p = 0.93) 。教师大剧场得分与面试评分相关(R S(123)= 0.65,P <0.01)相关。结论:SVI分数显示与沟通和专业性的教师得分没有显着相关性。这可能与申请人的学术绩效知识引入的偏见,教师面试官的不同类型的问题,或缺乏教师评估这些能力的统一标准。需要进一步的研究来确定SVI分数是否与居住期间的性能相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号