首页> 外文OA文献 >Malapposed Struts with Cre8, Biomatrix, and Xience Stents Assessed with OCT Immediately after Implantation and at 6-Month Follow-Up: Can the Different Biomechanical Characteristics of the Three Stents Impact on Struts Malapposition?
【2h】

Malapposed Struts with Cre8, Biomatrix, and Xience Stents Assessed with OCT Immediately after Implantation and at 6-Month Follow-Up: Can the Different Biomechanical Characteristics of the Three Stents Impact on Struts Malapposition?

机译:在植入后立即在10月和6个月的随访后立即使用Cre8,Biomatrix和XIENT支架进行了轰动的Struts:三个支架的不同生物力学特征是对Struts Malapposition的影响吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Although the clinical effects of stent malapposition remain controversial, several analyses of stent registries consistently have found that malapposed struts were frequently identified in patients who experienced stent thrombosis. In this study, which is a subanalysis of the previously published CREBX-OCT study, we compared optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis at the index percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and at six-month follow-up in 37 patients randomly assigned to receive, by a single operator, three different second-generation drug-eluting stents (Cre8, Biomatrix, and Xience) aiming to clarify if the malapposition observed at six-month follow-up was persistent or late-acquired. Moreover, we investigated if there were some differences in the behavior of the three different kinds of stents in relation to the struts malapposition. Material and Methods. We analyzed 614 and 599 cross sections and 5514 and 5377 struts at the index PCI and at six-month follow-up, respectively. The qualitative analysis of the plaque composition among the three groups did not show significant differences. Results. The lumen area did not significantly change from the index procedure to the six-month follow-up in the three groups; on the contrary, the number of malapposed struts increased significantly in the Cre8 and Biomatrix groups but not in the Xience group: 0.58 ± 1.51 and 3.29 ± 5.33 (p<0.023) in the Cre8 group, 0.55 ± 1.81 and 1.73 ± 2.28 (p<0.024) in the Biomatrix group, and 0.55 ± 1.5 and 0.25 ± 0.87 (p<0.166) in the Xience group, respectively. Conclusions. Therefore, the malapposition observed at six-month follow-up in our study population could be mainly considered as acquired and attributable to biomechanical reasons due to the structural differences among the three stents. This trial is registered with Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02850497.
机译:背景。虽然支架贴壁不良的临床效果仍然存在争议,支架登记的几种分析一致发现,malapposed支柱是在谁经历支架血栓的患者经常提到。在这项研究中,这是先前公布的CREBX-OCT研究的亚组分析,我们比较了光学相干断层扫描(OCT)指数经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的分析,并在六个月随访37例患者随机分配接受,由单个操作,三种不同的第二代药物洗脱支架(CRE8,生物基质,和的Xience)旨在澄清如果在六个月的随访中观察到的贴壁不良呈持续性或后期获得的。此外,我们调查,如果有三个不同类型的支架相对于支柱定位不良行为的一些差异。材料与方法。我们分析了614个599的横截面,并在指数PCI 5514个5377支柱和分别在六个月随访。三组间的斑块组成的定性分析并没有表现出显著差异。结果。管腔面积没有显著从索引程序更改为六个月随访三组; 0.58±1.51和3.29±5.33的CRE8组中(P <0.023),0.55±1.81和1.73±2.28(P:相反,malapposed支柱的数量在CRE8和生物基质组,但不是在的Xience组显著增加<0.024)的生物基质组中,和分别为0.55±1.5和0.25±0.87(在的Xience组中p <0.166)。结论。因此,定位不良,在六个月随访在我们的研究人口可能主要考虑为收购和归属于生物力学的原因是由于这三个支架之间的结构差异观察。这项试验是注册临床Trials.gov标识符:NCT02850497。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号