首页> 外文OA文献 >The Development of a Cognitive Skills Training to Support Driver Education – Comparing Performance of Experienced and Trained Learner Drivers
【2h】

The Development of a Cognitive Skills Training to Support Driver Education – Comparing Performance of Experienced and Trained Learner Drivers

机译:支持驾驶员教育的认知技能培训的发展 - 经验丰富的学习者司机的表现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Deficits in cognitive skills such as hazard perception are considered one of the major factors explaining the high numbers of crashes for novice drivers. Computer based trainings (CBTs) have been identified as a potential measure to improve such skills. Several CBTs have been developed since. Some of them have been evaluated, however, only by comparing a treatment group and a control group. While results show that the evaluated CBTs are somewhat effective, it is unclear how an experienced driver would have performed in the test scenarios. We developed our own CBT, and in a first step, evaluated it following the same known strategy (treatment and control group, adding a “paper based training group). Results provided evidence for the assumption that the CBT had a positive effect on learner drivers’ glance behaviour in simulated driving (Petzoldt et al., 2013). However, after we confirmed the effectiveness, we tested a group of experienced drivers on exactly the same simulator scenarios. The comparison between treatment, control and experienced driver group is presented in this paper. Results show comparable patterns of glance behaviour for the treatment group and the experienced drivers, superior to that of the control group. Driving performance rated by experts was mostly appropriate for all groups, with notable exceptions for some scenarios.
机译:危险感知等认知技能的赤字被认为是解释新手司机崩溃的主要因素之一。基于计算机的培训(CBT)已被确定为提高此类技能的潜在措施。自从此开发了几个CBT。然而,仅通过比较治疗组和对照组来评估其中一些。结果表明,评估的CBT有点有效,但目前尚不清楚经验丰富的驱动程序在测试方案中如何执行。我们开发了自己的CBT,并在第一步中,按照相同的已知策略(处理和对照组,添加“纸张的培训组)进行评估。结果为假设CBT对模拟驾驶中的学习者推动行为进行了积极影响的证据提供了证据(Petzoldt等,2013)。但是,在我们确认有效性之后,我们在完全相同的模拟器方案上测试了一组经验丰富的驱动程序。本文提出了处理,控制和经验的驱动程序组之间的比较。结果表明,治疗组和经验丰富的司机的相当的一瞥模式,优于对照组。专家评价的驾驶绩效主要适用于所有群体,有一些方案的例外情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号