首页> 外文OA文献 >Self-rated health and smoking among physicians and general population with higher education in Estonia: results from cross-sectional studies in 2002 and 2014
【2h】

Self-rated health and smoking among physicians and general population with higher education in Estonia: results from cross-sectional studies in 2002 and 2014

机译:爱沙尼亚高等教育的医生和一般人群自我评价的健康和吸烟:2002年和2014年的横断面研究结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Poor self-rated health (SRH) and smoking have consistently been shown to be related to mortality. The aim of this study was to explore SRH and smoking among physicians and general population with higher education in Estonia in 2002 and 2014 and to analyse the association of SRH with smoking and sociodemographic factors. Methods This study was based on cross-sectional postal surveys among physicians and general population with higher education in Estonia n in 2002 and 2014. Calculation of age-standardized prevalence of SRH and current smoking with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was performed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to measure association between SRH (at-least-good vs less-than good) and smoking status, study year, age group, ethnicity, and marital status. Fully adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were computed. Results Age-standardized prevalence of at-least-good SRH was 71.3 and 80.6% among male physicians, 68.4 and 83.1% among female physicians, 45.4 and 67.4% among men with higher education, and 44.7 and 63.1% among women with higher education in 2002 and 2014, respectively. Age-standardized prevalence of current smoking was 26.0 and 15.6% among male physicians, 10.2 and 5.9% among female physicians, 38.7 and 22.2% among men with higher education, and 20.9 and 16.4% among women with higher education in 2002 and 2014, respectively. There was no significant gender difference in at-least-good SRH, but prevalence of current smoking was significantly higher among men in both study groups in 2002 and 2014. Compared to year 2002, odds to have at-least-good SRH was higher in 2014 (OR = 1.64; 95% CI 1.16–2.31 among male and OR = 2.36; 95% CI 2.02–2.75 among female physicians, OR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.07–2.07 among men and OR = 2.40; 95% CI 1.84–3.13). Odds to have at-least-good SRH was significantly higher among non-smokers (except female physicians), in the youngest age group, and among Estonians. Conclusions This study gave an overview of differences in SRH and smoking between two target groups with higher education in two timepoints highlighting the importance of addressing smoking cessation counselling and health promotion campaigns in the population by different subgroups in Estonia.
机译:摘要背景可怜的自测健康(SRH)和吸烟一直被证明是相关的死亡率。这项研究的目的是探讨性与生殖健康和医生,并与高等教育在爱沙尼亚于2002年和2014年总人口中吸烟,并分析其与吸烟和社会人口因素与生殖健康的相关性。方法:本研究是基于医生和在爱沙尼亚高等教育普通人群中截邮调查n的SRH年龄标准化发病率和现在吸烟与95%置信区间(CI)的2002年和2014年的计算进行。采用多因素Logistic回归分析来衡量SRH之间的关联(AT-至少好VS低于好)和吸烟状况,进修一年,年龄,种族和婚姻状况。充分调整比值比(OR)和95%CI进行了计算。在-至少好SRH结果年龄标化患病率为71.3和男性医生中80.6%,68.4和女医生之间的83.1%,45.4和男子高等教育之间的67.4%,和44.7以及妇女与高等教育的63.1% 2002年和2014年,分别。目前吸烟的年龄标化患病率分别为妇女26.0和男性医生中15.6%,10.2和女医生之间的5.9%,38.7和男子高等教育之间的22.2%,以及20.9和16.4%,高等教育在2002年和2014年, 。有在-至少好SRH无显著性别差异,但现在吸烟的患病率较高显著男子在这两个研究组之间在2002年和2014年与2002年相比年,胜算有AT-至少好SRH在较高2014(OR = 1.64; 95%CI 1.16-2.31之间男性和OR = 2.36; 95%CI 2.02-2.75女性医师之间,OR = 1.49; 95%CI 1.07-2.07男性和OR = 2.40; 95%CI 1.84 -3.13)。赔率有AT-至少好SRH是非吸烟者显著提高(除女医师),最年轻的年龄组中,和爱沙尼亚之间。结论本研究得到的SRH区别的一个概述,并在两个时间点与高等教育的两个目标群体间吸烟强调在爱沙尼亚不同的分组解决人口戒烟咨询和健康促进活动的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号