首页> 外文OA文献 >Why are pro-poor exemption Policies in Tanzania better implemented in some districts than in others?
【2h】

Why are pro-poor exemption Policies in Tanzania better implemented in some districts than in others?

机译:为什么坦桑尼亚在某些地区要比在其他地区更好地执行扶贫豁免政策?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Like other African countries, Tanzania has in recent years, been implementing various exemptions and targeting programmes to protect and ensure equitable access to health care by poorer segments of the population. A body of evidence indicates that exemption policies, while potentially effective in principle, are ineffective in implementation. However, there is evidence that some districts, despite the challenges, perform better than others in terms of identifying the poor and allocating funds for the poor and vulnerable groups. Drawing from the review of minutes, health facility visits, and key informant interviews with the community representatives and the district health managers, the study explored why exemption policies in Tanzania are relatively better implemented in some districts than in others. The findings indicate that in Lindi district the pro-poor exemption mechanism was ineffective in implementation. There were no clear ways of identifying and protecting the poor household members. In contrast, in Iramba district the policy was relatively better implemented. The poor were identified at the village, ward, health facility and district levels. In some villages, the poor were grouped in 10s to form one household. Then, using the village funds, the Community Health Fund cards were purchased for them. Personal initiatives of the key district leaders, commitment of the district health management team and local government officials, regular supervisory visits, as well as incentives to the health facility committees and boards were the main factors that facilitated the implementation of the pro-poor exemption policy. It is concluded from this study that management and leadership practices including personal initiatives of the key district leaders, effective supervision mechanisms, commitment of the district health management team and local government officials, as well as incentives for the health facility committees and board members are pivotal for the implementation of the pro-poor exemption policies.
机译:像其他非洲国家一样,坦桑尼亚近年来也一直在执行各种豁免和针对性计划,以保护和确保较贫困人口平等获得保健服务。大量证据表明,豁免政策虽然在原则上可能有效,但在执行方面却无效。但是,有证据表明,尽管面临挑战,但某些地区在识别穷人和为穷人和弱势群体分配资金方面的表现要优于其他地区。通过对会议记录的回顾,对医疗机构的访问以及对社区代表和地区卫生经理的关键知情人访谈,该研究探索了为什么坦桑尼亚的豁免政策在某些地区要比其他地区更好地实施。调查结果表明,在林迪区,扶贫豁免机制的执行效果不佳。没有确定和保护贫困家庭成员的明确方法。相反,在伊兰巴地区,该政策的实施相对较好。在村庄,病房,医疗机构和地区各级确定了穷人。在一些村庄,穷人被分成十个几口,组成一个家庭。然后,使用村庄的资金为他们购买了社区卫生基金卡。关键地区领导人的个人举措,地区卫生管理团队和地方政府官员的承诺,定期监督访问以及对卫生设施委员会和委员会的激励措施,是促进实施扶贫政策的主要因素。从这项研究得出的结论是,管理和领导实践包括关键区域领导人的个人举措,有效的监督机制,区域卫生管理团队和地方政府官员的承诺以及对卫生机构委员会和董事会成员的激励措施至关重要。实施扶贫政策。

著录项

  • 作者

    Maluka Stephen O;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号