首页> 外文OA文献 >Application of Basic Pharmacology and Dispensing Practice of Antibiotics in Accredited Drug-Dispensing Outlets in Tanzania.
【2h】

Application of Basic Pharmacology and Dispensing Practice of Antibiotics in Accredited Drug-Dispensing Outlets in Tanzania.

机译:基本药理学和抗生素的配药实践在坦桑尼亚认可的配药点的应用。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Provision of pharmaceutical services in accredited drug-dispensing outlets (ADDOs) in Tanzania has not been reported. This study compared the antibiotics dispensing practice between ADDOs and part II shops, or duka la dawa baridi (DLDBs), in Tanzania. This was a cross-sectional study that was conducted in ADDOs and DLDBs. A simulated client method for data collection was used, and a total of 85 ADDOs, located in Mvomero, Kilombero, and Morogoro rural districts, were compared with 60 DLDBs located in Kibaha district. The research assistants posed as simulated clients and requested to buy antibiotics from ADDOs and DLDBs after presenting a case scenario or disease condition. Among the diseases presented were those requiring antibiotics and those usually managed only by oral rehydration salt or analgesics. The simulated clients wanted to know the antibiotics that were available at the shop. The posed questions set a convincing ground to the dispenser either to dispense the antibiotic directly, request a prescription, or refer the patient to a health facility. Proportions were used to summarize categorical variables between ADDOs and DLDBs, and the chi-square test was used to test for statistical difference between the two drug-outlet types in terms of antibiotic-dispensing practice. As many as 40% of trained ADDO dispensers no longer worked at the ADDO shops, so some of the shops employed untrained staff. A larger proportion of ADDOs than DLDBs dispensed antibiotics without prescriptions (P = 0.004). The overall results indicate that there was no difference between the two types of shops in terms of adhering to regulations for dispensing antibiotics. However, in some circumstances, eg, antibiotic sale without prescription and no referral made, for complicated cases, ADDOs performed worse than DLDBs. As many as 30% of DLDBs and 35% of ADDOs dispensed incomplete doses of antibiotics. In both ADDOs and DLDBs, fortified procaine penicillin powder was dispensed as topical application for injuries. There was no statistical difference between ADDOs and DLDBs in the violation of dispensing practice and both ADDOs and DLDBs expressed poor knowledge of the basic pharmacology of antibiotics.
机译:尚未报告坦桑尼亚有经认可的配药网点提供药品服务的情况。这项研究比较了坦桑尼亚的ADDO与第二部分商店或duka la dawa baridi(DLDB)之间的抗生素分配做法。这是在ADDO和DLDB中进行的横断面研究。使用了模拟的客户数据收集方法,将位于Mvomero,Kilombero和Morogoro农村地区的85个ADDO与位于Kibaha地区的60个DLDB进行了比较。研究助理冒充模拟客户,并在提出病例或疾病后要求从ADDO和DLDB购买抗生素。这些疾病包括需要抗生素的疾病,以及通常仅通过口服补液盐或止痛药来治疗的疾病。模拟客户希望了解商店中提供的抗生素。提出的问题为分配器奠定了令人信服的基础,该分配器可以直接分配抗生素,请求处方或将患者转至医疗机构。比例用于总结ADDO和DLDB之间的分类变量,卡方检验用于检验两种抗生素出口在抗生素分配实践方面的统计差异。多达40%的经过培训的ADDO分配器不再在ADDO商店工作,因此一些商店雇用了未经培训的人员。与不使用DLDB分发无处方抗生素的DLDB相比,ADDO的比例更大(P = 0.004)。总体结果表明,在遵守分配抗生素的法规方面,两种商店之间没有差异。但是,在某些情况下,例如在没有处方的情况下出售抗生素而没有进行转诊的情况下,对于复杂的案例,ADDO的表现要比DLDB差。多达30%的DLDB和35%的ADDO分配了不完全剂量的抗生素。在ADDO和DLDB中,都将强化的普鲁卡因青霉素散剂作为局部用药来治疗伤害。 ADDOs和DLDBs在违反配药实践方面没有统计学差异,ADDOs和DLDBs都表示对抗生素的基本药理学知识不强。

著录项

  • 作者

    Minzi Om; Manyilizu Vs;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号