首页> 外文OA文献 >“Culture Is What You See When Compliance Is Not in the Room”: Organizational Culture as an Explanatory Factor in Analyzing Recent INGO Scandals
【2h】

“Culture Is What You See When Compliance Is Not in the Room”: Organizational Culture as an Explanatory Factor in Analyzing Recent INGO Scandals

机译:“文化就是你在遵守房间时所看到的”:组织文化作为分析最近Ingo丑闻的解释性要素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In recent years, leading international nongovernmental organizations (INGO) such as Oxfam International, Save the Children, and Amnesty International have been implicated in scandals about sexual abuse and other forms of abuse of power and harassment. I suggest focusing on organizational and sectoral culture as an explanatory variable for these crises, which are particularly hard hitting for purportedly value-based organizations. In the case of NGOs, in my observation as a practitioner and ‘pracademic’, these are driven by six factors:(1) particular individual leadership traits that may be prevalent especially in the emergency and humanitarian relief related sector; (2) the effect of power on leaders’ perspectives and behaviors; (3) a culture of silence that makes it hard for NGO staff to speak up about toxic workplace behaviors; (4) the presence of deep power structures within NGOs which are not openly acknowledged and therefore addressed; (5) the myth of own innocence that leads NGOs to treat wrong doing as aberrations instead of systemic problems; and finally (6) a culture of limited individual and team-level accountability practices. The extent to which these cultural failures can be addressed through formal policy and (self)regulatory measures is limited, given that culture is primarily about informal, covert belief systems. NGOs will have to do sustained and disciplined culture work themselves if the roots of the scandals are to be taken away.
机译:近年来,国际非政府组织(INGO)如Oxfam International,拯救儿童和大赦国际涉及关于性虐待和其他形式的权力和骚扰的丑闻。我建议将组织和部门文化关注作为这些危机的解释性变量,这对于据称是基于价值的组织来说特别难以击中。在非政府组织的情况下,在我的观察中作为从业者和“普拉基血症”,这些是六个因素的驱动:(1)特定的个人领导特征,可能是普遍存在的紧急和人道主义救济相关部门; (2)权力对领导者的观点和行为的影响; (3)沉默文化使NGO工作人员难以说到有毒工作场所行为; (4)非政府组织内的深度功率结构的存在,这些结构没有公开确认并因此解决; (5)拥有无罪的神话,导致非政府组织对待错误的做法,而不是系统问题;最后(6)有限的个人和团队级问责制行为的文化。通过正式政策和(自我)监管措施可以解决这些文化失败的程度是有限的,因为文化主要是关于非正式的,隐蔽的信念系统。如果丑闻的根源被带走,非政府组织将不得不做持续和纪律的文化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tosca Bruno-van Vijfeijken;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2019
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号