首页> 外文OA文献 >Problems associated with direct displacement-based design of concrete bridges with single-column piers, and some suggested improvements
【2h】

Problems associated with direct displacement-based design of concrete bridges with single-column piers, and some suggested improvements

机译:用单柱墩的混凝土桥梁直接位移设计的问题,以及一些建议的改进

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Currently available displacement-based design (DBD) procedures for bridges are critically evaluated with a view to identifying extensions and/or modifications of the procedure, for it to be applicable to final design of a fairly broad class of bridges. An improved direct DBD procedure is presented, including a suite of comprehensive design criteria and proper consideration of the degree of fixity of the pier top. The design of an overpass bridge (originally designed to a current European Code), applying the improved ‘direct’ displacement-based design (DDBD) procedure is presented and both ‘conventional’ and displacement-based designs are assessed using non-linear response-history analysis (NLRHA); comparisons are made in terms of both economy and seismic performance of the different designs. It is seen that DDBD provided a more rational base shear distribution among piers and abutments when compared to the force-based design procedure and adequately captured the displacement pattern, closely matching the results of the more rigorous NLRHA.
机译:严格评估当前可用的桥梁位移计算(DBD)程序,以识别该程序的扩展和/或修改,以便将其应用于相当广泛的桥梁最终设计中。提出了一种改进的直接DBD程序,包括一套全面的设计标准以及对墩顶固定度的适当考虑。提出了采用改进的“直接”基于位移的设计(DDBD)程序的立交桥的设计(最初是根据当前的欧洲规范设计的),并使用非线性响应对“常规”和基于位移的设计进行了评估,历史分析(NLRHA);比较了不同设计的经济性和抗震性能。可以看出,与基于力的设计程序相比,DDBD在桥墩和桥台之间提供了更合理的基础剪力分布,并充分捕捉了位移模式,与更严格的NLRHA结果十分吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号