首页> 外文OA文献 >The precision and agreement of corneal thickness and keratometry measurements with SS-OCT versus Scheimpflug imaging
【2h】

The precision and agreement of corneal thickness and keratometry measurements with SS-OCT versus Scheimpflug imaging

机译:用SS-OCT与Scheimpflug成像进行角膜厚度和角膜测量测量的精度和协议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Purpose To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and Scheimpflug system and evaluate the agreement between the two systems in measuring multiple corneal regions in children. Methods Pachymetric and keratometric maps for both systems were evaluated. Central, midperipheral and peripheral corneal thickness (CT), keratometry and astigmatism power vectors were recorded. The three outcomes yielded by the same observer were used to assess intraobserver repeatability. The differences in the mean values provided by each observer were used to evaluate interobserver reproducibility. Within-subject standard deviation, test-retest repeatability (TRT) and coefficient of variation (CoV) were used to analyze the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility. Paired T-test and Bland-Altman were used to appraise interdevice agreement. Results Seventy-eight eyes of 78 children were included. The CoV was ≤2.12 and 1.10%, respectively, for repeatability and reproducibility. TRT and CoV were lower for central and paracentral CT measurements than for peripheral measurements. The SS-OCT device generated higher precision when acquiring CT data, whereas Scheimpflug system showed higher reliability when measuring corneal keratometry. Although the CT readings measured using SS-OCT were significantly thinner than Scheimpflug device (P <  0.001), the central and thinnest CT values were still of high agreement. The interdevice agreement of keratometry measurement was high for the central corneal region and moderate for the paracentral and peripheral areas. Conclusions The precision of CT measurements by SS-OCT was higher, while the reliability of keratometry measurements by the Scheimpflug system was higher in children. Apart from the measured values in the central corneal region, the thickness and keratometry readings should not be considered interchangeable between the two systems.
机译:摘要目的,评估扫源光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)和Scheimpflug系统的重复性和再现性,并评估两种系统在衡量儿童多个角膜地区的协议。方法评估两种系统的触发和静脉畸形图。记录中央,中间层和外围角膜厚度(CT),角膜腔和散光功率矢量。通过相同的观察者产生的三种结果用于评估血管内的可重复性。每个观察者提供的平均值的差异用于评估Interobserver再现性。在主题内标准偏差,测试 - 重复可重复性(TRT)和变形系数(COV)用于分析陷入机的重复性和Interobserver再现性。配对T检验和Bland-Altman用于评估互脱协议。结果包括78名儿童的七十八只眼睛。 COV分别为可重复性和再现性,分别为≤2.12和1.10%。 CTT和COV对于中央和辅向器CT测量而不是外围测量来降低。 SS-OCT器件在获取CT数据时产生更高的精度,而Scheimpflum系统在测量角膜音轨时则表现出更高的可靠性。尽管使用SS-OCT测量的CT读数比Scheimpflug设备显着薄,但中央和最薄的CT值仍然很高。中央角膜地区的角膜测量测量的交流协议高,对面向前缘和外围区域中等。结论SS-OCT通过SS-OCT测量的精度较高,而Scheimpflum系统的静脉测量测量的可靠性在儿童中较高。除了中央角膜区域中的测量值外,厚度和角膜测量读数不应被认为是两个系统之间的可互换。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号