首页> 外文OA文献 >Abstract No. 463 First Independent review of the vascade vascular closure device: the only device marketed as “proven” safer than manual compression

【2h】

Abstract No. 463 First Independent review of the vascade vascular closure device: the only device marketed as “proven” safer than manual compression

机译：摘要第463号第一次独立审查Vascade血管闭合装置：唯一的设备销售为比手动压缩更安全的设备更安全

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

著录项
引文网络
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

作者
A. Choksi; S. Tsymbalyuk; B. Tolaymat; G. Li; D. Gandhi; T. Miller; G. Jindal; C. Chao;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2019
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: The Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial [J] . XhepaE., ByrneR.A., SchulzS., EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology . 2014,第2期

机译：诊断性冠状动脉造影后比较血管闭合装置和手动加压以达到止血效果的随机临床试验的原理和设计：动脉穿刺部位的器械密封-闭合装置与手动加压（ISAR-CLOSURE）试验
2. Randomised comparison of manual compression and FemoSeal? vascular closure device for closure after femoral artery access coronary angiography: The CLOSure dEvices Used in everyday Practice (CLOSE-UP) study [J] . HolmN.R., SindbergB., SchouM., EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology . 2014,第2期

机译：手动加压和FemoSeal的随机比较？股动脉进入冠状动脉造影后进行闭合的血管闭合装置：日常实践（CLOSE-UP）研究中使用的CLOSure装置
3. Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial [J] . Schulz-SchüpkeS., HeldeS., GewaltS., JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association . 2014,第19期

机译：血管闭合装置的比较VS手动压缩后股动脉刺穿ISAR闭合随机临床试验
4. Safety by Design - How Electrical Devices Installed in the Industry can be Designed to Enhance Personnel Safety: Copyright Material IEEE, Paper No. PCIC-2018-53 [C] . Palak Parikh, Mital Kanabar, Michael Pilon IEEE Petroleum and Chemical Industry Technical Conference . 2018

机译：设计安全-如何设计行业中安装的电气设备以提高人员安全：版权材料IEEE，论文编号PCIC-2018-53
5. Improving Patient Safety by Quantifying Vascular Tissue Damage from Radio Frequency Induced Heating of Implanted Medical Devices during Magnetic Resonance Imaging. [D] . Gross, David C. 2016

机译：通过对磁共振成像过程中植入式医疗设备的射频感应加热产生的血管组织损伤进行量化，从而提高患者安全性。
6. Clinical and Subclinical Femoral Vascular Complications after Deployment of two Different Vascular Closure Devices or Manual Compression in the Setting of Coronary Intervention [O] . Hakan Yeni, Meissner Axel, Ahmet Örnek, 2016

机译：部署两种不同的血管闭合装置或在冠状动脉介入治疗中手动加压后的临床和亚临床股动脉血管并发症
7. Abstract No. 492 Comparison of complication rates associated with Celt and Angio-Seal vascular closure devices: a single-center retrospective review [O] . V. Agwu, A. Jost, I. Raheem, 2021

机译：摘要492与凯尔特和血管密封血管闭合装置相关的并发症率的比较：单中心回顾性评论
8. Vascular Catheter Devices: A Study of Safety and Performance, Volume 1 [R] . Rashkind, W. J. , Wagner, H. 1982

机译：血管导管装置：安全性和性能研究，第1卷

Abstract No. 463 First Independent review of the vascade vascular closure device: the only device marketed as “proven” safer than manual compression

著录项

引文网络

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅