首页> 外文OA文献 >To promote, or not to promote fundamental British values? Teachers’ standards, diversity and teacher education
【2h】

To promote, or not to promote fundamental British values? Teachers’ standards, diversity and teacher education

机译:促进,或不促进英国基本价值观吗?教师标准,多样性和教师教育

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this article we seek to problematize the presence of the requirement within the Teachers' Standards (DfE 2012), that they “should not undermine fundamental British values” in the context of initial teacher education in England. The inclusion of this statement within the Teachers’ code of conduct has made its way from the counter-terrorism strategy, Prevent and raises questions about Britishness, values and the relationship between the State and the profession more generally. We argue that the inclusion of the phrase within a statutory document that regulates the profession is de facto a politicization of the profession by the State thereby instilling the expectation that teachers are State instruments of surveillance. The absence of any wider debate around the inclusion of the statement is also problematic as is the lack of training for pre-service and inservice teachers since it means this concept of fundamental British values is unchallenged and its insidious racialising implications are unrecognized by most teachers.
机译:在本文中,我们寻求在教师标准(DFE 2012)中存在要求的要求,即他们在英格兰初始教师教育的背景下“不应破坏基本英国价值”。在教师行为准则中纳入了这一陈述,从反恐战略中取得了途径,预防和提高了关于英国,价值观和国家与职业之间的关系的问题。我们认为,在法定文件中列入监管该行业的法定文件是事实上,该行业的政治化通过该职业的政治化,从而灌输了教师是国家监督案文书的期望。围绕列表缺乏任何更广泛的辩论也是有问题的,因为它缺乏对服务前和服务教师的培训,因为这意味着这种基本英国价值观的概念是未经挑战的,其绝对的种族化的影响是由大多数教师无法识别的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号