首页> 外文OA文献 >Electronic nicotine delivery devices, and their impact on health and patterns of tobacco use: a systematic review protocol
【2h】

Electronic nicotine delivery devices, and their impact on health and patterns of tobacco use: a systematic review protocol

机译:电子尼古丁送货装置及其对烟草使用的健康和模式的影响:系统审查协议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction E-cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have recently attracted considerable attention. Among some individuals there is strong debate and a polarisation of views about the public health benefits versus harms of ENDS. With little regulation, the ENDS market is evolving, and new products are introduced and marketed constantly. Rapid developments in manufacturing, marketing and consumer domains related to ENDS will warrant frequent re-evaluation, based on the state of the evolving science. The purpose of this article is to describe a protocol for an ongoing comprehensive review of the published scientific literature on ENDS. Methods and analysis We will undertake a systematic review of published empirical research literature on ENDS using the National Library of Medicineu27s PubMed electronic database to search for relevant articles. Data from included studies will be extracted into a standardised form, tables with study details and key outcomes for each article will be created, and studies will be synthesised qualitatively. Ethics and dissemination This review synthesises published literature and presents no primary data. Therefore, no ethical approval is required for this study. Subsequent papers will provide greater detail on results, within select categories, that represent gaps in the literature base.
机译:简介电子烟或电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)最近引起了相当大的关注。在一些个人中,关于电子卫生系统对电子卫生系统的益处与危害之间存在着激烈的辩论和观点分歧。几乎没有法规,ENDS市场在不断发展,新产品不断推出和销售。与ENDS相关的制造,营销和消费领域的快速发展将需要根据不断发展的科学状况进行频繁的重新评估。本文的目的是描述一种协议,用于对已发表的有关ENDS的科学文献进行持续的全面审查。方法和分析我们将使用美国国家医学图书馆的PubMed电子数据库对ENDS的经验研究文献进行系统的综述,以查找相关文章。来自纳入研究的数据将被提取为标准化形式,将创建包含研究细节和每篇文章的主要成果的表格,并对研究进行定性综合。道德与传播该评论综合了已发表的文献,没有提供主要数据。因此,这项研究不需要道德上的认可。随后的论文将在选定类别内提供更多结果的详细信息,这些结果代表了文献基础上的空白。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号