首页> 外文OA文献 >Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial
【2h】

Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial

机译:半元素与聚合物配方脑伤害危重病患者的肠内营养:随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background The properties of semi-elemental enteral nutrition might theoretically improve gastrointestinal tolerance in brain-injured patients, known to suffer gastroparesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of a semi-elemental versus a polymeric formula for enteral nutrition (EN) in brain-injured critically ill patients. Methods Prospective, randomized study including brain-injured adult patients [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 8] with an expected duration of mechanical ventilation > 48 h. Intervention: an enteral semi-elemental (SE group) or polymeric (P group) formula. EN was started within 36 h after admission to the intensive care unit and was delivered according to a standardized nurse-driven protocol. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who received both 60% of the daily energy goal at 3 days and 100% of the daily energy goal at 5 days after inclusion. Tolerance of EN was assessed by the rate of gastroparesis, vomiting and diarrhea. Results Respectively, 100 and 95 patients were analyzed in the SE and P groups: Age (57[44–65] versus 55[40–65] years) and GCS (6[3–7] versus 5[3–7]) did not differ between groups. The percentage of patients achieving the primary endpoint was similar (46% and 48%, respectively; relative risk (RR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.05 (0.78–1.42); p = 0.73). The mean daily energy intake was, respectively, 20.2 ± 6.3 versus 21.0 ± 6.5 kcal/kg/day (p = 0.42). Protein intakes were 1.3 ± 0.4 versus 1.1 ± 0.3 g/kg/day (p < 0.0001). Respectively, 18% versus 12% patients presented gastroparesis (p = 0.21), and 16% versus 8% patients suffered from diarrhea (p = 0.11). No patient presented vomiting in either group. Conclusion Semi-elemental compared to polymeric formula did not improve daily energy intake or gastrointestinal tolerance of enteral nutrition. Trial registration EudraCT/ID-RCB 2012-A00078-35 (registered January 17, 2012).
机译:摘要背景,半元素肠内营养的特性可能从理论上改善脑伤害患者的胃肠道耐受性,已知患有胃瘫痪。本研究的目的是比较半元素与聚合物配方的疗效和耐受性用于脑伤害危重病人的肠内营养(EN)。方法预期,随机研究,包括脑损伤的成年患者[Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS)≤8],预期的机械通气持续时间> 48小时。干预:肠内半元素(Se组)或聚合物(P组)配方。在入住重症监护手持设备后36小时开始,并根据标准化护士驱动的协议提供。主要终点是患者的百分比,在纳入后的3天内接到每日能源目标的60%,在纳入后5天在每日能源目标的100%。通过胃瘫,呕吐和腹泻的速率评估en的耐受性。结果分别地,100两95例患者在SE和P组分析:年龄(57 [44-65]对55 [40-65]岁)和GCS(6 [3-7]对5 [3-7])组之间没有差异。实现初级终点的患者的百分比分别是相似的(46%和48%;相对风险(RR)[95%置信区间(CI)] = 1.05(0.78-1.42); p = 0.73)。平均每日能量摄入量分别为20.2±6.3与21.0±6.5 kcal / kg /天(p = 0.42)。蛋白质摄入量为1.3±0.4与1.1±0.3g / kg /天(P <0.0001)。分别为18%,12%患者呈现胃瘫(P = 0.21),16%对8%患者患有腹泻(P = 0.11)。没有患者在任何一个组中呈现呕吐。结论半元素与聚合物配方相比未改善日常能量摄取或肠内营养的胃肠道耐受性。试用注册Eudract / ID-RCB 2012-A00078-35(2012年1月17日注册)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号