首页> 外文OA文献 >Improving Students’ Argumentation Style Ability in Writing Essay through Discourse Analysis Model Critical Thinking Map Oriented
【2h】

Improving Students’ Argumentation Style Ability in Writing Essay through Discourse Analysis Model Critical Thinking Map Oriented

机译:通过语篇分析模型批判思维地图写作文章中的学生论证风格能力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Students’ ability in writing anessay, as one of language skills which can improve the creativity in language, is a serious problem that should be investigated by a deep research. Besides for showing that language as a thinking tool, writing competence can be seen as a product if we take a look from critical thinking ability measurement aspect and also as a process if we take a look at the individual development itself aspect. One of indicator for measuring the students’ critical is by the ability in delivering their argumentation style which is showed in their essay. The goal of this research is obtaining the objective discourse analysis model critical thinking map oriented in improving students’ argumentation style skills in writing anessay, hence can be used as a modelling for the growing of students’ creativity in a variety of writing skills. Based on paired-samples t test, the pre-test/post-test paired-sample is significant, because the significance (2-tailed) is less than 0.05 in the standard of 95%. This is mean, there is a real difference between the ability before and after getting the treatment. The sample’s ability after getting the treatment is better than before. As well as if be compared with control class, experiment class shows the significant superiority for all aspects of essay writing assessment.
机译:学生在写作anessay的能力,作为可以提高语言创造力的语言技能之一,是一个严重的问题,应该由深度研究来调查。除了将这种语言作为思维工具表明,如果我们从临界思维能力测量方面看一下,可以将写入能力视为一种产品,如果我们看看个人发展本身,也可以作为一个过程。测量学生至关重要的指标之一是通过提供他们的论文中显示的论证风格的能力。本研究的目标是获得目标话语分析模型,以提高学生的论证在书面形式方面的论证风格技能导向,因此可以用作在各种写作技巧中越来越多的学生创造力的建模。基于配对样品T检验,预测试/后次配对样品显着,因为标准的显着性(2羽尾)小于0.05,标准为95%。这是平均值,在获得治疗前后的能力之间存在真正的差异。在获得治疗后的样本的能力优于以前。除了与对照类别进行比较,实验课程表明论文写作评估的各个方面的显着优势。

著录项

  • 作者

    R. Panca Pertiwi Hidayati;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号