首页> 外文OA文献 >Residents’ support for the Olympic Games: Single Host-City versus Multiple Host-City bid arrangements
【2h】

Residents’ support for the Olympic Games: Single Host-City versus Multiple Host-City bid arrangements

机译:居民对奥运会的支持:单个主持人城市与多个主持人城市出价安排

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study explored the efficacy of an extant resident support model developed by Gursoy and Kendall (2006) in a hypothetical Olympic Single Host-City and Multiple Host-City bid arrangement. Participants were undergraduate students enrolled in two Ontario universities and randomly assigned into one of two hypothetical 2028 Summer Olympic Games bid arrangements: (1) SHC – Toronto, and (2) MHC – Toronto and Montreal. Results revealed the extant model did not perform well in the MHC bid arrangement. Findings suggest the relative importance of perceived benefits and costs in garnering support from residents may differ between SHC and MHC bid arrangements. Implications for the design and exploration of MHC resident support models for the Olympic Games are discussed. This is the first study to explore resident support in a MHC bid context. The study sets the scene for research following this new IOC development and informs future studies on this important topic.
机译:本研究探讨了Gursoy和Kendall(2006)开发的现存常驻支持模型在一个假想的奥运单宿主城和多个主持人城市出价安排中的疗效。与会者是本科学生,入读两所安大略大学,随机分配到两个假设的2028次夏季奥运会出价安排中的一个:(1)SHC - 多伦多,(2)MHC - 多伦多和蒙特利尔。结果显示,现场模型在MHC出价安排中表现不佳。调查结果表明,感知效益和从居民获得资金支持的相对重要性可能在SHC和MHC投标安排之间有所不同。讨论了奥运会MHC居民支持模型的设计和探索的影响。这是第一项探索MHC出价上下文中探索居民支持的研究。该研究设定了在这个新的IOC开发之后的研究场景,并通知了未来的研究这一重要主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号