首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment of five different guideline indication criteria for spirometry, including modified GOLD criteria, in order to detect COPD: data from 5,315 subjects in the PLATINO study
【2h】

Assessment of five different guideline indication criteria for spirometry, including modified GOLD criteria, in order to detect COPD: data from 5,315 subjects in the PLATINO study

机译:评估五种不同的肺活量指标指征标准,包括修改后的GOLD标准,以检测COPD:来自PLATINO研究中5,315名受试者的数据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Spirometry is the gold standard for diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although there are a number of different guideline criteria for deciding who should be selected for spirometric screening, to date it is not known which criteria are the best based on sensitivity and specificity.AIMS: Firstly, to evaluate the proportion of subjects in the PLATINO Study that would be recommended for spirometry testing according to Global initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)-modified, American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), National Lung Health Education Program (NLHEP), GOLD and American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) criteria. Secondly, we aimed to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive and negative predictive values, of these five different criteria.METHODS: Data from the PLATINO study included information on respiratory symptoms, smoking and previous spirometry testing. the GOLD-modified spirometry indication criteria are based on three positive answers out of five questions: the presence of cough, phlegm in the morning, dyspnoea, age over 40 years and smoking status.RESULTS: Data from 5,315 subjects were reviewed. Fewer people had an indication for spirometry (41.3%) according to the GOLD-modified criteria, and more people had an indication for spirometry (80.4%) by the GOLD and ATS/ERS criteria. A low percentage had previously had spirometry performed: GOLD-modified (14.5%); ACCP (13.2%); NLHEP (12.6%); and GOLD and ATS/ERS (12.3%). the GOLD-modified criteria showed the least sensitivity (54.9) and the highest specificity (61.0) for detecting COPD, whereas GOLD and ATS/ERS criteria showed the highest sensitivity (87.9) and the least specificity (20.8).CONCLUSION: There is a considerable difference in the indication for spirometry according to the five different guideline criteria. the GOLD-modified criteria recruit less people with the greatest sum of sensitivity and specificity.
机译:背景:肺活量测定法是诊断慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的金标准。尽管有许多不同的准则来决定应该选择谁进行肺活量测定筛查,但迄今为止,根据敏感性和特异性,尚不清楚哪种准则是最佳的。目的:首先,评估PLATINO研究中受试者的比例根据全球阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD),美国胸科医师学院(ACCP),美国国家肺健康教育计划(NLHEP),GOLD和美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会(ATS)的建议,建议将其推荐用于肺活量测定/ ERS)标准。其次,我们旨在比较这五个不同标准的敏感性,特异性以及阳性预测值和阴性预测值。方法:来自PLATINO研究的数据包括有关呼吸道症状,吸烟和以前的肺活量测定的信息。 GOLD修改的肺量计指示标准基于五个问题中的三个肯定答案:咳嗽,早晨痰,呼吸困难,40岁以上的年龄和吸烟状况。结果:审查了来自5,315名受试者的数据。根据GOLD修改的标准,较少的人有肺活量指标(41.3%),而根据GOLD和ATS / ERS的标准,有更多人有肺活量指标(80.4%)。以前曾经进行过肺活量测定的人比例很低:GOLD修饰(14.5%); ACCP(13.2%); NLHEP(12.6%);黄金和ATS / ERS(12.3%)。 GOLD修改的标准显示检测COPD的最低灵敏度(54.9)和最高的特异性(61.0),而GOLD和ATS / ERS的标准显示最高的灵敏度(87.9)和最低的特异性(20.8)。根据五项不同的准则,肺活量测定的指征有很大差异。经GOLD修改的标准招募的人才较少,但其敏感性和特异性却最高。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号