首页> 外文OA文献 >Definitions, Sources and Self-Reported Consumption of Regionally Grown Fruits and Vegetables in Two Regions of Australia
【2h】

Definitions, Sources and Self-Reported Consumption of Regionally Grown Fruits and Vegetables in Two Regions of Australia

机译:在澳大利亚两个地区的定义,来源和自我报告的区域生长的水果和蔬菜消费

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Regional food systems are complex networks, with numerous retail sources that underpin a local economy. However, evidence is limited regarding how consumers define, identify, and source regionally grown fresh fruits and vegetables (RGFFV). A cross-sectional study was conducted in Tasmania (TAS) and South Western Australia (SWA) to compare how RGFFV are defined, identified and sourced by consumers, including self-reported consumption of selected RGFFV. Survey data were analyzed using the Chi-square test and t-tests. Results (TAS n = 120, SWA n = 123) identified that consumers had mixed perceptions of how RGFFV are defined, including produce sold at farmers markets, or grown within their region (TAS/SWA). RGFFV were commonly identified using product labelling (55% TAS, 69% SWA; p > 0.05). Respondents reported frequently shopping for RGFFV at major supermarkets, with more TAS respondents shopping weekly in comparison to SWA respondents (67% vs. 38%; p < 0.001). Supermarkets offered convenience and consumers enjoyed the experience of farmers’ markets, especially in TAS (42%) in comparison to SWA (21%; p = 0.012). The major RGFFV consumed were root vegetables and apples/pears, but consumers were frequently unsure about the produce’s provenance. Our findings indicate multiple opportunities to improve consumption of fresh, regional produce in TAS and SWA, which may positively impact regional economic growth and community health.
机译:区域粮食系统是复杂的网络,与支撑一个地方经济的众多零售源。然而,证据是有限的关于消费者如何界定,识别和源地区种植的新鲜水果和蔬菜(RGFFV)。横断面研究是在塔斯马尼亚(TAS)和南方西澳大利亚(SWA)进行比较RGFFV如何定义,识别和消费者的采购,包括选择RGFFV的自我报告的消费量。使用卡方检验和t检验调查数据进行了分析。结果(TAS N = 120,SWA N = 123)来识别消费者具有RGFFV是如何定义的混合感知,包括农产品在农贸市场出售,或者它们的区域(TAS / SWA)内生长。 RGFFV使用产品标签常见的确定(55%TAS,69%SWA; P> 0.05)。受访者在大型超市报道频繁购物为RGFFV,更TAS受访购物每​​周相比SWA受访者(67%对38%; P <0.001)。提供便利和消费者超市享受农贸市场的相比,SWA的经历,特别是在TAS(42%)(21%; P = 0.012)。消耗的主要RGFFV是根茎类蔬菜和苹果/梨,但消费者是经常不确定农产品的出处。我们的研究结果表明多的机会,以提高在TAS和SWA新鲜,当地食材,可以产生积极的影响区域经济增长和社会的健康消费。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号