首页> 外文OA文献 >Variación fenológica infraespecífica de la codorniz de California (Callipepla californica, Aves: Odontophoridae) de la península de Baja California, México
【2h】

Variación fenológica infraespecífica de la codorniz de California (Callipepla californica, Aves: Odontophoridae) de la península de Baja California, México

机译:加州Quadorniz(Californica Californica,Birds:Odontophoridae)的森林变异缩醛(鸟类:Odontophoridae)的Baja California Peninsula,墨西哥

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To determine useful diagnostic characters for infraspecific taxonomic identification of California Quail (Callipepla californica) from Baja California peninsula, we compared phenotypically four nominal subspecies by means of multivariate statistical analysis of 18 variables: nine morphometric and nine chromatic. We examined 338 museum specimens from 114 sites, and compared using two categories: subspecies and type locality. The principal components analysis (PCA) did not showed congruent groups with known taxonomic subspecies in spite of that characters associated to the measurements of peak and coloration in both sexes had a signifi­cant discriminant power. Discriminant function analysis (AFD) found significant differences in the a priori comparison categories, P <0.05. Phenotypically, the distinction of subspecies (C.c. californica, C.c. plumbea, C.c. decolorata and C.c. achrustera) was only possible in its type localities. The males are separated by the culmen length, jaw length, brightness of the chest and flank, and yellow patch, while the females by the beak length, wing length, and jaw length. In summa, the results obtained are not sufficient evidence for the validation or rejection of the nominal subspecies, so the presence of a mosaic pattern in the phenotypic variation of the populations could explain the observed morphometric and colorimetric differences.
机译:为了确定从下加利福尼亚半岛加利福尼亚鹑(Callipepla夜蛾)的infraspecific分类鉴定有用的诊断特点,我们比较了18个变量的多元统计分析的方法表型4标称亚种:九种形态和九角色。我们从114个站点检查了338个博物馆标本,并使用两类:亚种和型局部性。主要成分分析(PCA)未显示出具有已知分类学亚种的一致群体,尽管与两性中的峰值和着色的测量相关的角色具有显着的判别权。判别函数分析(AFD)发现优先比较类别的显着差异,P <0.05。表型,亚种的区别(C.C.Cap.Cafornica,C.C.Plumbea,C.C.Decolorata和C.C.Chrustera)仅在其类型的地方可能。雄性由锡尔森长度,颌骨长度,牙齿亮度,侧翼和黄色贴片分开,而股票长度,翼长度和下颚长度。在Summa中,所获得的结果并不充分证据验证或拒绝标称亚种,因此群体的表型变异中的马赛克模式的存在可以解释观察到的形态学和比色差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号