首页> 外文OA文献 >Peroral Cholangioscopy-Guided Forceps Biopsy and Endoscopic Scraper for the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Extrahepatic Biliary Stricture
【2h】

Peroral Cholangioscopy-Guided Forceps Biopsy and Endoscopic Scraper for the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Extrahepatic Biliary Stricture

机译:Peroral Cholangiocopy引导的钳子活组织检查和内窥镜刮刀,用于诊断不确定的嗜肝胆道狭窄

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) has become a widely-used technique in diagnosing indeterminate biliary strictures, enabling optical viewing of the biliary system and targeted biopsies under direct vision. The diagnostic utility of the new endoscopic scraper, Trefle®, for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) has also been reported. However, the diagnostic utility of POCS-guided and Trefle®-assisted tissue acquisition for ECC has never been compared empirically. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Trefle®-assisted tissue acquisition for diagnosing ECC compared with POCS-guided tissue sampling. Methods: Patients who underwent Trefle®-assisted tissue acquisition or POCS-guided forceps biopsy to differentiate ECC from benign biliary disease between April 2014 and March 2018 were enrolled retrospectively. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of Trefle®-assisted tissue acquisition and POCS-guided forceps biopsy based on pathological evaluation. We also compared adverse events associated with Trefle®-assisted tissue acquisition with those of POCS-guided forceps biopsy. Results: We enrolled 34 patients with biliary disease and performed Trefle®-assisted tissue acquisition and POCS-guided forceps biopsy in 14 and 20 patients, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Trefle®-assisted tissue acquisition were 87.5%, 83.3%, and 85.7%, respectively, and for POCS-guided forceps biopsy, these were 90.0% each. Statistical values of Trefle®-assisted tissue acquisition and POCS-guided tissue acquisition were not significantly different. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of adverse events between the Trefle®-assisted tissue acquisition and the POCS-guided forceps biopsy (35.7% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.770). Compared with patients who underwent POCS procedure, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed for fewer patients who underwent Trefle®-assisted tissue acquisition (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The diagnostic ability of Trefle®-assisted tissue acquisition for ECC is similar to that of POCS-guided tissue acquisition. Trefle®-assisted tissue acquisition might also help to preserve the sphincter of Oddi and its digestive function.
机译:背景:Peroral Cholangiococe(POC)已成为诊断不确定胆道狭窄的广泛使用的技术,使胆道系统的光学观察和目标活组织检查在直接视觉下的光学观察。还报道了新内窥镜刮板的诊断用途Trefle®,用于脱胸腺胆管癌(ECC)。然而,从未经验比较POCS引导和TREFLE®辅助组织采集的诊断效用。我们评估了Trefle®辅助组织采集的疗效和安全性,用于诊断ECC与POCS引导的组织采样相比。方法:接受TREFLE®辅助组织采集或POCS引导钳活检的患者在2014年4月至2018年4月至2018年3月间从良性胆道疾病中分化ECC。基于病理评价,我们评估了Trefle®辅助组织采集和POCS引导钳活组织检查的诊断性能。我们还将与Trefle®辅助组织采集相关的不良事件与POCS引导的镊子活组织检查相关联。结果:我们分别注册了34例胆管疾病,并分别进行了Trefle®辅助组织采集和POCS引导的镊子活检,分别在14名和20名患者中。 TREFLE®辅助组织采集的敏感性,特异性和准确性分别为87.5%,83.3%和85.7%,并且对于POCS引导的钳子活组织检查,这些是90.0%。 TREFLE®辅助组织采集和POCS引导组织采集的统计值没有显着差异。 TREFLE®辅助组织采集和POCS引导钳活组织检查(35.7%vs.25.0%,P = 0.770)之间没有显着差异。与接受POCS程序的患者相比,对较少患者进行了内窥镜晶状体切开术,用于较少的TREFLE®辅助组织采集(P <0.001)。结论:对ECC的Trefle®辅助组织采集的诊断能力类似于POCS引导组织采集的诊断能力。 Trefle®辅助组织采集也可能有助于保护Oddi的括约肌及其消化功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号