首页> 外文OA文献 >Resilience to emotional distress in response to failure, error or mistakes: A systematic review
【2h】

Resilience to emotional distress in response to failure, error or mistakes: A systematic review

机译:恢复失败,错误或错误的情绪痛苦的恢复能力:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Perceptions of failure have been implicated in a range of psychological disorders, and even a single experience of failure can heighten anxiety and depression. However, not all individuals experience significant emotional distress following failure, indicating the presence of resilience. The current systematic review synthesised studies investigating resilience factors to emotional distress resulting from the experience of failure. For the definition of resilience we used the Bi-Dimensional Framework for resilience research (BDF) which suggests that resilience factors are those which buffer the impact of risk factors, and outlines criteria a variable should meet in order to be considered as conferring resilience. Studies were identified through electronic searches of PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Knowledge. Forty-six relevant studies reported in 38 papers met the inclusion criteria. These provided evidence of the presence of factors which confer resilience to emotional distress in response to failure. The strongest support was found for the factors of higher self-esteem, more positive attributional style, and lower socially-prescribed perfectionism. Weaker evidence was found for the factors of lower trait reappraisal, lower self-oriented perfectionism and higher emotional intelligence. The majority of studies used experimental or longitudinal designs. These results identify specific factors which should be targeted by resilience-building interventions.
机译:对失败的看法涉及一系列心理障碍,甚至可以提高焦虑和抑郁症的单一体验。然而,并非所有人都在失败后经历重大的情绪困扰,表明存在弹性。目前的系统审查综合研究调查了因失败经验而导致的情绪困扰的弹性因素。对于恢复性的定义,我们利用了用于恢复力研究(BDF)的双维框架,这表明弹性因素是缓冲危险因素的影响的影响,并概述了一个变量的标准应该符合要求,以便被视为赋予赋予批准。通过电子搜索PSYCINFO,MEDLINE,EMBASE和知识网络的电子搜索来确定研究。 38篇论文中报告的四十六项相关研究符合纳入标准。这些提供了存在因素的证据,以应对失败,赋予情绪痛苦的因素。找到了最强的支持,为更高的自尊,更积极的归因风格和较低的社会规定的完美主义。较弱的证据是针对较低特征的因素,较低的自我导向的完美主义和更高的情绪智力。大多数研究使用了实验或纵向设计。这些结果确定了应由韧性建设干预措施所针对的特定因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号