首页> 外文OA文献 >Integrating Livability Principles into Transit Planning: Screening Chicago Bus Rapid Transit Opportunities
【2h】

Integrating Livability Principles into Transit Planning: Screening Chicago Bus Rapid Transit Opportunities

机译:将居民原则整合到过境规划:筛选芝加哥巴士的快速交通机会

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pilot Chicago Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) routes proposed in 2008 were impractical to build, did not meet Institute for Transportation and Development Policy defined “gold standard” BRT, and were selected without considering the Livability Principles guiding investment by the U.S. government. Streets incompatible with BRT and not meeting basic constructability standards were eliminated. The remaining contiguous street sections were scored on the weighted performance of 14 quantitative proxies for the Livability Principles. Transit connectivity considerations further refined the pool to produce potential BRT routes. For discussion purposes, these routes were organized into a hypothetical BRT network to complement the existing rapid transit system; potential 2010 travel demand impacts were modeled. This study identified 10 potential BRT routes for further consideration. The integration of the Livability Principles into the study was promising but had limited impact because of the greater than anticipated influence of right-of-way width requirements.
机译:2008年提出的飞行员芝加哥巴士快速过境(BRT)路线对建设不切实际,没有符合运输和发展政策研究所定义的“黄金标准”BRT,并被选为未考虑美国政府投资的居民原则。消除了与BRT不相容的街道,不符合基本结构标准。剩余的连续街道部分被评定为宜居原则的14个定量代理的加权性能。 Transit Connectivity考虑进一步改进了池以产生潜在的BRT路线。出于讨论目的,这些路线被组织成假设的BRT网络,以补充现有的快速过境系统;潜在的2010年旅行需求的影响是模拟的。本研究确定了10个潜在的BRT路线,供进一步考虑。宜家原则进入研究的融合是有前途的,但由于预期的宽度要求的预期影响大,影响有限。

著录项

  • 作者

    Joshua Anderson; Josh Ellis;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号