首页> 外文OA文献 >Is it justifiable to perform tibio-talar arthrodesis rather than fixation as the treatment for severe pilon fractures?
【2h】

Is it justifiable to perform tibio-talar arthrodesis rather than fixation as the treatment for severe pilon fractures?

机译:是否合理地进行胫骨关节关节,而不是固定作为严重的皮层骨折的治疗方法?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Category: Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcome at minimum 2 years follow up post fixation of pilon fractures to that of patients undergoing elective procedure (in the form of TAR or ankle arthrodesis) for primary osteoarthritis of the ankle to assess whether pilon fracture patients would benefit from tibio-talar arthrodesis as a primary procedure rather than fixation to avoid significant functional disability between primary fixation and subsequent arthrodesis. Methods: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of patients operated between April 2012 and December 2015. All patients with primary osteoarthritis undergoing elective TAR/arthrodesis (Group A) had pre-op functional scores recorded (MOX-FQ, EQ-5D and Foot and ankle outcome score FAOS). Patients with bilateral ankle arthritis, previous reconstructive surgery, inflammatory arthritis, hip and knee arthritis, spinal pathology and underlying neurological conditions were excluded from Group A. Patients in Group B (post Pilon fracture fixation with a minimum 2 year follow up) completed a postal questionnaire with the above scores. Outcomes between groups were compared using inferential statistical tests using SPSS. Results: Mean age of patients in Group A and Group B were (62.6 ± 10.9 years) and (46.4 ± 15 years) respectively; p<0.001. In group B, 9 patients (16.6%) had associated injuries and 45 patients (83.3%) had isolated injuries. 49 patients underwent an open reduction and internal fixation vs. 5 patients with hybrid fixator as a definitive management in Group B with 2 patients having significant infection (1 in each group). The results of functional scores comparing Group A to Group B (including sub-group analysis) are awaited and will be submitted subject to acceptance of this abstract. Conclusion: The outcomes of pilon fracture are well known to be poor with high rate of secondary osteoarthritis and significant functional disability associated with it in young individuals in active employment. The gold standard treatment for patients with significant osteoarthritis of the ankle is tibio-talar arthrodesis. However, a group of these patients continue to have high functional disability between initial injury and to the point of tibio-talar arthrodesis. The results of this study will highlight the justification to perform tibio-talar arthrodesis as a definitive treatment at the time of injury, rather than fixation.
机译:类别:创伤介绍/目的:本研究的目的是在至少2年期间比较功能结果,随后将Pilon骨折的固定骨折,对接受选修程序的患者(以焦油或踝关节形式)进行原发性骨关节炎踝关节评估脊柱骨折患者是否会受益于胫骨关节术中作为主要程序,而不是固定,以避免原发性固定和随后的关节术之间的显着函数残疾。方法:这是对2012年4月至2015年4月期间经营的患者预期收集的患者数据的回顾性研究。所有患有选修焦虑/关节炎(A组)的原发性骨关节炎的患者均记录前op功能评分(MOX-FQ,EQ-5D和脚和脚踝结果得分粮农组织)。双侧踝关节炎的患者,先前的重建手术,炎症性关节炎,髋关节和膝关节炎,脊柱病理和潜在的神经系统疾病被排除在A组(B组患者(Pilon Fracture固定术后2年后)完成邮政问卷与上述分数。使用SPSS使用推杆统计测试比较组之间的结果。结果:A组和B组患者的平均年龄分别(62.6±10.9岁)和(46.4±15年); P <0.001。在B组中,9例患者(16.6%)有伤害,45名患者(83.3%)患有孤立伤。 49例患者接受了开放的减少和内固定患者,5例杂交固定剂作为B组中的明确管理,其中2例患者有重大感染(每组1例)。可以等待与B组(包括小组分析)比较A组A的功能评分结果,并将提交受此摘要的影响。结论:山地骨折的结果是众所周知的,在积极就业中的年轻人中,具有高次骨关节炎和与其相关的显着功能性残疾。踝关节明显骨关节炎的患者的黄金标准治疗是胫骨关节瘤。然而,一组这些患者在初始损伤和胫骨关节术点之间继续具有高功能性残疾。本研究的结果将突出造成胫骨关节以损伤时的明确治疗,而不是固定的理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号