首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating four gap-filling methods for eddy covariance measurements of evapotranspiration over hilly crop fields
【2h】

Evaluating four gap-filling methods for eddy covariance measurements of evapotranspiration over hilly crop fields

机译:评估四个间隙填充方法,用于丘陵田野蒸发蒸发

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Estimating evapotranspiration in hilly watersheds is paramount for managingwater resources, especially in semiarid/subhumid regions. The eddy covariance(EC) technique allows continuous measurements of latent heat flux (LE).However, time series of EC measurements often experience large portions ofmissing data because of instrumental malfunctions or quality filtering.Existing gap-filling methods are questionable over hilly crop fields becauseof changes in airflow inclination and subsequent aerodynamic properties. Weevaluated the performances of different gap-filling methods before and aftertailoring to conditions of hilly crop fields. The tailoring consisted of splitting the LE time seriesbeforehand on the basis of upslope and downslopewinds. The experiment was setup within an agricultural hilly watershed innortheastern Tunisia. EC measurements were collected throughout the growthcycle of three wheat crops, two of them located in adjacent fields onopposite hillslopes, and the third one located in a flat field. We consideredfour gap-filling methods: the REddyProc method, the linear regression betweenLE and net radiation (Rn), the multi-linear regression of LE against the otherenergy fluxes, and the use of evaporative fraction (EF). Regardless of the method,the splitting of the LE time series did not impact the gap-filling rate, andit might improve the accuracies on LE retrievals in some cases. Regardless ofthe method, the obtained accuracies on LE estimates after gap filling were closeto instrumental accuracies, and they were comparable to those reported inprevious studies over flat and mountainous terrains. Overall, REddyProc wasthe most appropriate method, for both gap-filling rate and retrievalaccuracy. Thus, it seems possible to conduct gap filling for LE time seriescollected over hilly crop fields, provided the LE time series are split beforehandon the basis of upslope–downslope winds. Future works should addressconsecutive vegetation growth cycles for a larger panel of conditions interms of climate, vegetation, and water status.
机译:估计丘陵流域的蒸散是管理的至关重要的水资源,尤其是半干旱/郊区。伊迪协方差(EC)技术允许连续测量潜热通量(LE)。然而,EC测量的时间序列经常经历大部分由于乐器故障或质量过滤而缺少数据。现有的差距填充方法是丘陵庄稼领域的质疑,因为气流倾斜的变化及随后的空气动力学性质。我们评估了之前和之后的不同间隙填充方法的性能剪裁到丘陵庄稼领域的条件。剪裁包括分裂LE时间序列事先在上升和下坡的基础上风。该实验是在农业丘陵流域内设置的突尼斯东北部。在整个生长中收集了EC测量三个小麦作物的循环,其中两个位于相邻的领域对面的山坡,第三位位于平坦的领域。我们考虑过四个间隙填充方法:reddyproc方法,之间的线性回归le和净辐射(rn),Le对另一个的多线性回归能量通量,以及蒸发级分(EF)的用途。无论方法如何,LE时间序列的分裂不会影响填充率,并且在某些情况下,它可能会提高LE检索的准确性。不管该方法,在间隙填充后的Le估计上获得的精度接近乐器的准确性,它们与报告的那些相当以前的公寓和山区的研究。总的来说,reddyproc是最合适的方法,用于间隙填充率和检索准确性。因此,似乎可以对LE时间序列进行间隙填充通过丘陵庄稼领域收集,只要预先拆分LE时间序列在上升式下坡风的基础上。未来的作品应该解决连续植被生长循环,用于更大的条件气候,植被和水位条款。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号