首页> 外文OA文献 >ALTIMETRY ASSESSMENT OF ASTER GDEM v2 AND SRTM v3 DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS: A CASE STUDY IN URBAN AREA OF BELO HORIZONTE, MG, BRAZIL
【2h】

ALTIMETRY ASSESSMENT OF ASTER GDEM v2 AND SRTM v3 DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS: A CASE STUDY IN URBAN AREA OF BELO HORIZONTE, MG, BRAZIL

机译:ASTER GDEM V2和SRTM V3数字高度模型的Altimetry评估 - 以巴西MG贝罗·奥里藏区市区为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract: This work is an altimetry evaluation study involving Digital Elevation Models ASTER GDEM version 2 and SRTM version 3. Both models are readily available free of charge, however as they are built from different remote sensing methods it is also expected that they present different data qualities. LIDAR data with 25 cm vertical accuracy were used as reference for assessment validation. The evaluation study, carried out in urbanized area, investigated the distribution of the residuals and the relationship between the observed errors with land slope classes. Remote sensing principles, quantitative statistical methods and the Cartographic Accuracy Standard of Digital Mapping Products (PEC-PCD) were considered. The results indicated strong positive linear correlation and the existence of a functional relationship between the evaluated models and the reference model. Residuals between -4.36 m and 3.11 m grouped 47.7% of samples corresponding to ASTER GDEM and 63.7% of samples corresponding to SRTM. In both evaluated models, Root Mean Square Error values increased with increasing of land slope. Considering 1: 50,000 mapping scale the PEC-PCD classification indicated class B standard for SRTM and class C for ASTER GDEM. In all analyzes, SRTM presented smaller altimetry errors compared to ASTER GDEM, except in areas with steep relief.
机译:摘要:这项工作是涉及数字海拔模型Aster GDEM版本2和SRTM版本3的高级评估研究。这两种型号都可以随时可用,但由于它们由不同的遥感方法构建,因此它们也预计它们也存在不同的数据品质。使用25cm垂直精度的LIDAR数据作为评估验证的参考。在城市化地区进行的评估研究调查了残留物的分布以及观测到的土地坡课程之间的关系。考虑了遥感原理,定量统计方法和数字测绘产品(PEC-PCD)的制图精度标准。结果表明,评估模型与参考模型之间的功能关系强的正线相关性强。 -4.36 m和3.11 m之间的残留物分组47.7%的样品对应于Aster GDEM和63.7%对应于SRTM的样品。在两个评估的模型中,随着陆坡的增加,根均方误差值增加。考虑1:50,000映射缩放PEC-PCD分类指示SRTM和C类用于ASTER GDEM的B类标准。在所有分析中,与ASTER GDEM相比,SRTM呈现较小的高度误差,除了陡峭的区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号